transcript

Speaker 1:
[00:00] Hey, good morning, everybody. Welcome to Vince on a Thursday. It is great to have you with us. What a great day to be an American. It's always a great day to be an American. We got a big show ahead for you. I'm gonna talk about the latest out of Virginia. I told you yesterday, we're not done yet. We're not done yet. Despite the election, that crazy election rigging operation that the left conducted on Tuesday, that is not the end of the story. In fact, legal battles raging like crazy in the Commonwealth. And I've got some updates on some breaking news that just took place in the last 24 hours. A glimmer of hope here. In fact, we'll be joined by the former attorney general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Ken Cuccinelli, is joining us in just minutes. We'll get his expert analysis on what just happened and what is likely to happen. He actually has a very optimistic view of what comes next year. We may be able to thwart this election rigging operation still. That's ahead on the program. Also, the left is very, very angry that the Trump administration is going after the Southern Poverty Law Center. They're very upset about this, which is hilarious. I think it means we're over the target. More on that and a lot to get to here on this edition of Vince. As always, great to have you with us. We've got great sponsors on our program. Brickhouse Nutrition is a fantastic and enduring sponsor of our program. They support everything we're doing here, and we support them as well. They've got a great operation. People talk about those weight loss injections because they're looking for very radical results. They want to lose a lot of weight. Makes sense. Here's the thing. The way those injections actually work is they help to lower your blood sugar and reduce your appetite. So what if you want to do that? What if you want to lose the weight, but you don't want the painful weekly injections, especially when you hear about some of those side effects? That's why doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition created a weight loss supplement called Lean. And the results, they're actually remarkable. The studied ingredients in Lean have been shown to help lower your blood sugar, help you burn fat by converting it into energy and help you curb your appetite and your cravings so you're less hungry. But listen, Lean by Brickhouse Nutrition is not for the casual dieter. It's for frustrated dieters with 10 or more pounds to lose. So let's get you started, 20% off, free rush shipping. Just visit takelean.com. Enter the code Vince and you'll get a discount. Promo code Vince, takelean.com. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. And it's not a substitute or alternative for care from a healthcare provider. Mulvaney 70 Charles says, Lean is working for me. Sure. I love that. I love that. Hey guys, great to be with you again this morning. And for those of you who are listening on the podcast, a reminder that we do this live every day, 8 o'clock in the morning, rumble.com/vince. We have this beautiful audience, truly beautiful. According to all of the audience measurements that are taken, this is the most gorgeous audience that assembles at ADM on Rumble on any given day. So pat yourselves on the back and wink at yourself in the mirror when you see yourself again. Yeah, no, thank you for being here. And thank you to all of you who watched the show yesterday. I joined Dan Bongino's program for a bit, and it was great. It was great. We're doing this every other Wednesday. We're doing this like kind of swap thing where we go back and forth. Dan will come on my radio show on every other Wednesday. And then the alternating Wednesdays, I joined him on his podcast. It was great. It was great yesterday. Actually, I felt like that was, did you feel like that was the best one yet? I felt like that was the best one yet, as Dan and I were chatting. We were just kind of running down the kind of all the all the prosecutions that have been going on. And I was, you know, Dan was saying to me yesterday, if you missed it, I highly encourage you to go check it out. I thought it was great. I thought it was worth your time at, which is why I'm recommending it to you. But Dan was talking about while he was in the FBI, he just couldn't tell me anything. And he goes, I know that that was really tough. Because I really wish I could, but I couldn't tell you anything about what was happening behind the scenes, because he's bound by duty and the law, not to, of course. And I told him yesterday, I was like, Dan, I'm telling you, this was such a source of great frustration to me. I mean, how many of you were with me during that last year while Dan was at the FBI, and I'm filling in for his audience, and people keep on assuming that I've got all the intel. They're like, well, you know, Dan, what's actually happening? Who's being arrested, what's going on? I'm telling you, I'm just divining most of this the same way you're divining this. I try and talk to people, find out more information, but again, it was a source of great frustration. And it's a credit to Dan, by the way, because there's lots of people who could have entered that world and then just been just running their mouth all the time. The guy didn't do that. The guy didn't do that. And so we see this week in the Southern Poverty Law Center indictment, kind of the fruits of Dan's labors, actually not kind of, literally, the fruits of Dan's labors. We see what they were investigating and why that, you know, it was under seal, but now it's all free. Now it's in the public. A massive indictment announced this week as the Southern Poverty Law Center gets slapped with 11 charges and they involve funding KKK guys and neo-Nazis laundering the money, creating this fraudulent environment where they claim that they were tackling hate crimes, but instead they were stoking hate in order to make it seem like they had some noble mission, something to confront. It's like as sinister as it gets. It's like one of these sort of demented Lex Luthor style movie plots. It's crazy. They're like Batman villains. Here they are at scale causing all of this fraud. I noticed, and this came up in our conversation yesterday, I noticed in October of last year that the FBI had cut the Southern Poverty Law Center off entirely. It was back then that you had the media accusing the Trump administration of hating civil rights, being against black people, being against minorities or whatever, accusing them of bigotry for cutting the Southern Poverty Law Center off. I said to Dan, Dan, you cut them off because they were a criminal enterprise. You knew it. You couldn't say anything about it. Now, the rest of the world knows about it. It's just an amazing sequence of events. It's a reminder that these things, as frustrating as they are, talk about frustrating, they take time. The pursuit of justice takes time. If you're going to do it right, it takes time. What do they say in the military? Slow is fast. Is that an expression, you veterans? I feel like that's a shooting expression. Slow is fast. Sometimes in order to do things the right way. Yes, slow is fast and fast is smooth. Slow is fast and fast is smooth. Sometimes in order to do things the right way, it's going to take some time. It's going to take some time. Now, we're waiting right now for what comes next with these guys, with the grand conspiracy case down in Florida. But let me just tell you something about the left. The left is freaking out right now. That we found the Southern Poverty Law Center. It reminds me of, you remember when President Trump took down DOJ, or not took down DOJ, but advanced DOJ, took down USAID, took down all of this rampant fraudulent funding for NGOs. Remember all this? You remember the freakout that we saw? You remember the freakout? The freakout was out of control. You had members of Congress standing outside of USAID, protesting like lunatics, as if the rest of the country was obsessed with USAID. In fact, I would venture a bet that most of the country hadn't even really heard of USAID, or if they had heard of it, they hadn't really put much thought into what it was. It sounded like some sort of generic feel-good humanitarian operation. USAID, USAID, it's probably helping people, whatever. The Democrats were standing outside that building, like the whole world was collapsing. I can't believe what Donald Trump is doing. And the rest of us are going, thank God Donald Trump is doing this. Well, it's happening again. It's happening again. Yeah, no, that's right. People are pointing out in the chat. This is how Tesla's got attacked. This is why the left started leading terror attacks on Tesla dealerships all across the country. God bless Elon, baby. I mean, Elon Musk. Boy, has your opinion of Elon Musk changed through the years? Mine has. I'm like all on board with Elon now. I think Elon's great. I think he's been wonderful. Man, a Thomas Edison of our time. But the guy jumps in, he helps the government out, and he starts purging all of this wasteful spending. And the left goes crazy. We found their stash. We found their stash. It's like we found their stack of pornos, and they're trying to claim it's not theirs. It's not mine. It's not mine. Yeah, OK. Yeah, we found them. And we found them again, the Southern Poverty Law Center. So the structure here of how the SPLC was moving all this money, no doubt this is the template for the way the left takes money, fleeces donors, steals from federal taxpayers in a lot of cases, and then uses it to advance chaos. This is the template. What you saw yesterday in the Southern Poverty Law Center indictment two days ago now. And so that's why they're freaking out. So all over X today, I'm seeing these these Democrats posting, the Southern Poverty Law Center doesn't deserve this. How dare you? Donald Trump is doing awful things. This is so mean. Here's Chuck Schumer whining, whining about the Southern Poverty Law Center being prosecuted yesterday. Here's Chuck, cut one.

Speaker 2:
[10:07] Every day Cash Patel remains in this job is another day that undermines the FBI and its mission. Take yesterday's press conference. The head of the FBI, the nation's top law enforcement officer, spent the entire time getting into fights with reporters about his alleged drunken behavior, his partying, his overall fitness for the job. This has become a dangerous, unacceptable distraction for the FBI, which has so much important work to do. Donald Trump has led us to war right now against Iran, a nation known for sophisticated cyber attacks. Why is Cash Patel not focused on that? Why is Cash Patel not focused on the serious threat facing his country? Every day, these stories of misconduct persist. They undermine the mission of the FBI. Every day, these questions about Patel, his behavior, his character linger. They weaken confidence in the leadership of the most important law enforcement agencies in the world. Cash Patel must resign immediately. He's not a serious person. He has not shown that he has the skills required for the job. And the last few days have shown he does not have the judgment to lead an agency like the FBI. This is what happens when Trump just chooses acolytes.

Speaker 1:
[11:31] Hilarious.

Speaker 2:
[11:31] People who suck up to him for important jobs.

Speaker 1:
[11:34] He's so mad.

Speaker 2:
[11:35] That shouldn't be any criteria in choosing the head of the FBI.

Speaker 3:
[11:39] Stay mad, dude.

Speaker 2:
[11:40] But instead, it seems to be Trump's only criteria, and it puts him in trouble. It puts him in the hot seat, in the frying pan, over and over again.

Speaker 3:
[11:47] In the frying pan.

Speaker 2:
[11:48] By choosing people whose only criteria is loyalty to him.

Speaker 1:
[11:51] I'd stay away from cooking analogies.

Speaker 2:
[11:53] Americans deserve steady, sober leadership from their FBI director, especially during a time of war. Cash Patel is not it. And if Cash Patel wants to keep partying, he can do it somewhere else without putting the safety of the American people online.

Speaker 1:
[12:13] What a toll. You mad? You mad? You mad? Remember that dude who appeared on Bill O'Reilly years ago? Who was that rapper? He was just in there. He spent the whole interview going, You mad? You mad? Chuck Schumer? You mad? I love how this guy can't even grill a cheeseburger. He has no idea what he's talking about. Actually, all he's doing is the same thing these Democrats always do. When we catch them, they just advance wrap up smears. So now he's like, oh, Cash Patel is an awful person. Really? He's an awful person? Because last I checked, they're prosecuting everybody under the sun. They've got murders down to record lows. They're stopping the fentanyl inflows. The FBI has joined the immigration mission to secure our border, which is at the scariest level we've ever seen. And you're whining on the Senate floor that the SPLC has been taken out, that somebody's finally cracking down on a left-wing fraudulent operation, a big one. Just wait until we get to act blue. Watch the freak out that Chuck Schumer is going to do on that one. It's just amazing. All right, coming up, I want to talk to you about what's happening in Virginia. We just got breaking news out of Virginia that a judge has ruled that Tuesday's election rigging operation was unconstitutional. More on that with Ken Cuccinelli in just a moment. Bon Charge is wonderful. They've got the infrared sauna blanket. I have it. My wife has. Allison has the red light face mask. Ever since they sent them to us, we can't recommend them enough. I first turned to that sauna blanket to help with muscle recovery, detoxification. It's become a total game changer. It's easy to use. Just wrap yourself up. But the infrared heat work, it's magic. It's created a huge difference in how I relax and rejuvenate and how I feel afterward. The red light face mask, my wife loves it. She's been using it to improve her skin's texture, reduce inflammation. She's seen fantastic results. It's like having a mini spa treatment right at home. Now, if you're thinking about trying either of these things out, you're in luck. Head to boncharge.com, B-O-N charge.com. Use the code Vince at checkout, get 15% off. Both of these products have made a huge impact on helping us and our wellness. You're gonna love them too. Use the code Vince at boncharge.com, save 15%. These statements and products have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease or condition. All right, happy to have joining us right now, the former Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Ken Cuccinelli. Sir, it's nice to see you again. Thanks for being here today.

Speaker 4:
[14:29] Yeah, good to be with you, Vince.

Speaker 1:
[14:30] Okay, so we get this ruling out of Tazewell, Virginia, the Tazewellian devil. This judge comes out and he says, you know what, this is a completely unconstitutional election that happened this week. Tell me why.

Speaker 4:
[14:46] So first of all, it wasn't done before the referendum because Virginia legal precedent says that you wait until after. It's part of the legislative process. This judge moved very quickly. There are four different state constitutional problems with the referendum, Vince. Three of them relate to the referendum itself and one is just because of how incredibly gerrymandered the proposed maps are. This judge had ruled on two of the process problems earlier, and the Supreme Court held that appeal, like I said, until after the referendum. Those two issues are in front of the Virginia Supreme Court. Yesterday, this judge heard argument and ruled on the third process challenge, which is a really brazen violation of the state constitution by the Democrat General Assembly. And because he found them in violation, he enjoined counting the votes and certifying the election. So it's frozen in place for now. We'll see if the Virginia Supreme Court lifts that. But either way, the Virginia Supreme Court is moving very fast itself. They are receiving briefing today on those first two issues that I mentioned are already in front of them, with oral arguments scheduled, as I understand it, for Monday. So this is going to move very, very quickly. And because of the brazenness of the constitutional violations, I expect the Supreme Court to throw this referendum out.

Speaker 1:
[16:15] What are the primary constitutional violations here?

Speaker 4:
[16:18] So like a lot of states, Virginia has a process to amend its own constitution that includes passing the amendment two different times through the General Assembly with an election in between. Well, the idea being that you get to hold the delegates accountable before they pass it a second time.

Speaker 1:
[16:42] Right.

Speaker 4:
[16:43] And as you know, of course, because you did a lot of reporting on it, we had an election in Virginia last year, 2025. We got our moderate governor, Abigail Spanberger, and the House of Delegates was up for election as well. And last time the Democrats had full control back around 2020, they gave us 45-day elections. And so the election of 2025 began on September 19th. But the General Assembly didn't pass the first proposed, it's called first passage of the proposed amendment until Halloween last year. Over a million people had already voted, and they want that election to count as the intervening election required explicitly in the Virginia Constitution. And I think they're going to have a very, very hard time with that. It is kind of funny to see them hoisted on their 45-day card here.

Speaker 1:
[17:42] Yes, like it's the only time they recognize an individual election day, is when they can steal power.

Speaker 4:
[17:47] No, and that's what they're arguing, Vince. They're arguing the election day is the day we count. That's election day. It isn't all these days we're voting. Now, their problem with that is the issue in front of the TAS will judge yesterday was the second passage of the constitutional amendment, which happened January 19th of this year. And the same provision of the state constitution requires 90 days to pass from the second passage of a proposed amendment until it is submitted to the voters. That's the language of the constitutional amendment. And the vote, of course, finished Tuesday, April 21st. Well, that's 90 days after January 19th. But again, we have 45 days of voting in Virginia. People started voting on March 6th. That's when it was submitted to the voters. Again, this is a very brazen violation of the timing requirements. And it's interesting here because the no side, my side, really played catch up. We were outspent three or four to one. But even the money that came in came in late. And so the no performance really improved near the end. We won election day. They barely won early voting by about a point and a half. They won mail-in voting by something like 45 points.

Speaker 1:
[19:17] Yes.

Speaker 4:
[19:17] Even though it was only about 12% of the total votes, it was such a massive margin that it swamped the other two categories.

Speaker 1:
[19:25] Can you?

Speaker 4:
[19:27] And mail voting takes a while to bring together for your team. So having late money keeps you out of that game.

Speaker 1:
[19:34] Okay, tell me, I'm getting a lot of questions about how the votes were counted on election day. I wanna go just straight to the question of the tally at the end of the night, because people are talking about, well, Northern Virginia is suddenly, basically, yes, caught up dramatically. What are the mechanics there, and is there any cause for suspicion on your part? What do you view as the issue there?

Speaker 4:
[19:57] The mechanics in Virginia are that the urban areas are so big that they're very slow to come in. And that may be partly intentional, there's no question about it. But so Fairfax always comes in last, or not last, but very late. So you see a shift to the blue side in every election as the night goes on. So when I saw that we were, the no side, was winning by six points at around 830, I thought, oh, this isn't enough. Because I know how those votes come in later in the night. And mail-in voting, as I said, was a 45-point margin in their favor. And mail votes are allowed to keep coming in for another till tomorrow, really. So the margin is going to trickle a little wider.

Speaker 1:
[20:49] I love, they're still coming in. It's so crazy. We're trying to stop that nonsense. Okay. So tell me about the Supreme Court of Virginia. How much can we trust their judgment here? Are they a reliable body?

Speaker 4:
[21:01] You know, Vince, I think they are. And it's four, three Republican appointees. They certainly all know they're never getting reappointed with this General Assembly. Our General Assembly appoints judges. So with this radical General Assembly, that's not happening. But more than that, even the Democrat judges, I think, are going to look at this and see that it is so brazen that they can't bring themselves to part ways with what I expect the Republican judges do. You could see a 7-0 ruling on the two particular constitutional violations that I mentioned to you. Maybe not 7-0 on all four constitutional violations, but I think on the two that I just referenced to you, we could see 7-0 rulings.

Speaker 1:
[21:49] Doesn't it matter that the new map is in no way actual communities? It's designed to straight up destroy real communities in Virginia.

Speaker 4:
[21:57] So Vince, that's the fourth constitutional challenge. We actually have a compactness and contiguity requirement in the Virginia Constitution. This is the most gerrymandered map in Virginia of yours and my lifetime.

Speaker 1:
[22:10] Yes.

Speaker 4:
[22:11] So it is the most vulnerable map I've ever seen to the compactness challenge under the Virginia Constitution. So I think that's the weakest of the four challenges. But really what it is, is the least strong of the four challenges because all four constitutional challenges are very strong on a legal basis.

Speaker 1:
[22:31] But if that's a part of the Constitution and it's not enforced here, then that section has no meaning.

Speaker 4:
[22:38] Yeah, if this map doesn't violate it, you can pretty much write that provision off as ever mattering. I agree with you on that. But we won't get to that argument unless the Democrats win on all three procedural arguments. The no side only has to win one argument. If this is unconstitutional on any basis, then it's done, it's thrown out. You never get to judging the map itself, which is a statutory creature that doesn't come into being unless you get rid of the current maps, which is what the referendum did.

Speaker 1:
[23:13] It's remarkable. So just to be clear on the timeline, let's assume for a moment the unfortunate event that we lose here and that they get their new maps. Wouldn't that require a pretty rapid fire electoral process to start picking people to be primary candidates? And then the whole scheme, it's gonna take a series of elections, right?

Speaker 4:
[23:33] Yeah, the whole scheme is gonna be accelerated. But I will say that in anticipation of that, Governor Spanberger, remember, she opposed, opposed gerrymandering. And the Democrat General Assembly moved our primaries from June to August to buy more time. That being said, the courts understand that all of your points are valid. I mean, even a third week of August primary, the voting starts in the beginning of July. That's the voting. So candidate qualification and everything else has to happen before that, obviously. And so I think the court's going to move very fast. I would be surprised if the ruling takes beyond the middle of May from the Virginia Supreme Court.

Speaker 1:
[24:20] That's coming really soon. OK, so you, as I understand it, I've seen you doing some posting on this. You're optimistic about this ruling. Do you think that we won't have a rigged election come November? Tell me about your optimism here.

Speaker 4:
[24:34] If I were a betting man, I would definitely be betting on the no side for sure in court.

Speaker 1:
[24:41] This is, I mean, that's a pretty big deal. I mean, that's more optimism than we're used to, Ken. We're not used to this kind of optimism.

Speaker 4:
[24:48] You and I have talked for many years. You know that optimism is not my forte.

Speaker 1:
[24:53] Right.

Speaker 4:
[24:55] And yet, and I'm a bit of an idealist, but I don't see this court parting ways with the Virginia Constitution so far that they allow this referendum to stand. It's just too brazen and naked.

Speaker 1:
[25:10] It really is. And then finally, on the brazenness of it, the language of the actual vote about restoring fairness. Do you want to restore fairness or not? And I had some listeners early in the process contact me and tell me, I had a family member who voted yes because they were mistaken. They were misled by the referendum. They didn't realize they should have voted no. And does that play a role here in defeating this or is that not as big of a deal?

Speaker 4:
[25:38] I don't think it's as big a deal. I think it is powerful from a persuasiveness standpoint. And the judge in Taswell yesterday did include that as a basis. He called it misleading. We have what's called a plain English rule for our ballot language. We do not have a neutrality rule. But his ruling essentially was that it violated the plain English rule, that calling this fair violated plain English, and was so misleading that it was disqualifying. So he found that even on a statutory basis. I think that the court, the Supreme Court of Virginia will decide this on a state constitutional basis, not on that basis.

Speaker 1:
[26:23] Okay. And then finally, there's lots of, I've seen a lot of people come up with these ideas on like how to resolve this. And here's one I'll just throw at you. Should Virginia's, the portion of Virginia that was once a part of Washington DC, Alexandria, Arlington, should we restore the square? Should we make DC a square again, and then make Virginia a red state? You think that's a good idea?

Speaker 4:
[26:45] So if DC were 10 miles square, I would have won my governor's race 13 years ago. But this referendum would have still squeaked by just so people know. And Spanberger would have still won by double digits. I think a better idea is to take the populated side portions of DC today, give them to Maryland, and leave only government buildings, non-residential government buildings as part of the District of Columbia, forever eliminate the possibility that DC could be a state, and leave those three electoral votes at zero every presidential election. Yes, Maryland gets one more congressman, but we forever get rid of the threat of DC as a state.

Speaker 1:
[27:29] Yeah, that'd be great. But also every time you make an offer like that, it really exposes that the left doesn't want that. They want more senators. They always-

Speaker 4:
[27:35] Right, of course.

Speaker 1:
[27:36] It's a scam. It's all a scam.

Speaker 4:
[27:38] All the more reason to do it.

Speaker 1:
[27:40] Yes, indeed. Ken Cuccinelli, thank you as always. Thank you for thinking this through and thank you for just being great. And I appreciate your time today, sir.

Speaker 4:
[27:47] Yeah, good to be with you, Vince.

Speaker 1:
[27:48] All right. There he is, the former Attorney General of Virginia. Well, that's good news. I'll take that. I mean, that's- What an emotional roller coaster this week has been. I know JDD 64 says, I feel better about this now. Yeah, me too. I feel a little encouraged. I don't want to feel too encouraged, though. I want to keep my expectations low so I can be really surprised when it happens, pleasantly surprised when it happens. But the big news here is that in May, we are looking- By mid-May, Ken Cuccinelli says we could see this big Supreme Court judgment out of the state of Virginia saying everything about this referendum was unconstitutional and that the maps cannot change. They cannot change. We cannot rig the maps. And Ken is not lying. He's not the guy who's wearing rose-colored glasses all the time. He's not overly optimistic about these things in the past. That's just him giving us his assessment. So God bless him for it. I hope it comes true. I hope it comes true. I hope we can have Ken back for a big victory lap on all this.

Speaker 4:
[28:48] Do you feel better about that?

Speaker 1:
[28:49] I feel better. That's yeah, from his mouth, the God's here. I totally agree with that. Thank you, Red Laurie. All right, a lot more to get to in the program here and we'll get to it in just a moment. I want to thank the great sponsors who make interviews like that possible. I want to thank, let's see here, Rumble Wallet. Rumble Wallet, we love Rumble. We love Rumble. Rumble has been a great platform for us in our program. And Rumble Wallet is a great platform for your finances. In fact, if you've ever been curious about buying and investing in crypto, Bitcoin, stable coins, USAT, but you feel like it was too complicated, Rumble Wallet is an easy way to get started. You can buy, sell and manage your cryptocurrencies all in one place. It's very straightforward. And what makes Rumble Wallet unique is that you can use it to support the Freedom First community that we've built here on Rumble. So download the Rumble Wallet app, sign up with your existing Rumble account, just complete a few security steps and boom, you're set up in minutes. You can start with just a few dollars. And with MoonPay built into Rumble Wallet, you can easily buy crypto using your credit card, your debit card or your bank wire. If you've been thinking about the advantages of crypto, just download Rumble Wallet. Now click the link in our description or search Rumble Wallet in your app store. Download Rumble Wallet today and move your assets to where they belong, in your hands, in your control. Rumble Wallet is a technology provider only, it's not a custodial service. See terms at wallet.rumble.com. Love Rumble, love Rumble Wallet. Blackout Coffee is also a great sponsor of our program and it fills me every day. I've got my mug here. I'll tell you about my mug in a second. Let's talk about this great company, Blackout. If you want your coffee strong, smooth, and roasted for maximum flavor, then Blackout Coffee is for you. Blackout Coffee is an America first company. They roast their beans right in the USA. They ship them fresh right to your door. Their blends are bold, full-bodied, crafted for people who take their coffee very seriously. Their medium dark roast delivers a strong flavor, no bitterness, it's smooth, powerful, and it gives you that extra boost. You need to stay focused all day long. Love that. I love that the Blackout Coffee keeps coming. They've got a subscribe and save option. You don't want to add a coffee. Swap flavors, pause, cancel anytime, get deep discounts plus free shipping, all while earning reward points on every purchase that you can redeem for future orders. Now, this is very convenient and it saves you money. They have whole bean, ground, flavored coffees, espresso, single serve options. There's something for everybody who loves coffee. Today, get 20 percent off your first order, blackoutcoffee.com. Use the code VINCE at checkout. That's blackoutcoffee.com. Do what everybody in chat does. Everybody drinks Blackout. blackoutcoffee.com, promo code VINCE, 20 percent off your first order. blackoutcoffee.com, promo code VINCE. Thank you to Blackout. Yes, Mulvaney70Charge likes the Bongino Army Roast. They have that. It's very good. Brutal Awakening, also very good. Look, Blueberry Crunch showing up in the chat. Also very good. I like the Pitch Black Espresso. Here is my mug today. This is the, let me show you this. Let's see if I can zoom in on this. I don't even know if I can zoom. Here's the mug I'm wielding today. This is, for those of you who saw me with Dan yesterday, Dan mentioned this quote specifically. I gotta block my face. That's how it gets in there. Were it not for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all. That's the expression. Perhaps you've heard it before. And as Dan correctly pointed out yesterday, that is actually Chris Plant's expression. Chris Plant, who has said this, if you ever hear it uttered on the floor of the United States Congress, it's my boy Chris. That's his mug, the Chris Plant Show. He's great. Love Chris. Were it not for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all. It is a great mug. I totally agree. Great mug. All right. Let's see. What else do we have here on the menu today of the many things we need to talk about? I love this. This is fun. Hakeem Jeffries is a ridiculous figure. His brain operates on dial-up, which is why he's so freaking slow. We call him the dial-up Democrat. Hakeem Jeffries has spent the week acting like a full-blown lunatic. He was declaring, as I mentioned yesterday, that he's going to war against the American people. War everywhere, all the time. Yeah. Okay. Sure, buddy. He also says that he wants to go to war with the state of Florida. Anybody in chat in Florida? Anybody down there in the free state of Florida? I love that it's the free state these days. In Florida, there is a conversation happening right now in order to fight back against the last election rigging operations about doing some redistricting in order to get a couple more Republican seats in place. And that's fun. I love that. And here's Ron DeSantis responding. So basically Hakeem Jeffries is like, we're going after you. We're going after you. And Governor DeSantis had a great moment yesterday where he ripped the guy he calls dollar store Obama. Listen, here's Ron DeSantis yesterday.

Speaker 5:
[34:00] This guy Jeffries popping off in Washington about Florida. He wants to be Speaker of the House and he's kind of like, you know, more liberal than Pelosi and all this other stuff from New York City. I just want to know, I just say, oh, Florida, can you do, we're going to go after Florida. Please be my guest. I will pay for you to come down to Florida and campaign. I'll put you up in the Florida Governor's mansion. We'll take you fishing. We'll do all this stuff. There's nothing that could be better for Republicans in Florida than to see Jeffries, Hakeem Jeffries, everywhere around this state. Voters will not like what they see. They will not want that type of ideology. And so the door is open. The invitations out there, I don't think there'd be anything better for the Republican Party of Florida, but to have Jeffries there. Now, I kind of feel bad for the guy because he's as left as they come. He's always going left. And yet the far left hates him. They call him a dollar store Obama. They call him APAC Shakur. All these different derogatory names that they do. And so he's tried to ingratiate himself with there, but they're just not drinking the Kool-Aid. And so they give him a hard time. So I kind of feel bad for that. But please be my guest to come down in Florida. We would love to have you. Any questions?

Speaker 1:
[35:23] You know, it's been a while since I've seen a good Ron DeSantis clip. Not because they haven't existed. I just haven't seen them. They have crossed my timeline. Really funny. Really funny. I love that. You know, I really I think I think by now DeSantis and President Trump have passed things up. I keep seeing reports that DeSantis would love to work with President Trump in the administration. We've seen speculation lately that he might he would love to be the secretary of war, the attorney general or something. OK, maybe. I mean, but but right now, candidly, you know, Hegseth, I think he's doing a great job. He's he's cleaning up that place. He's got the morale actually getting boosted, getting rid of the DEI stuff and refocusing the military on lethality, the stuff that the military is supposed to be focused on excellence and not on left-wing social engineering. So I think Hegseth is doing a great job there. And then, you know, Todd Blanch, man, what is this audition? You know, right now he's in this like, you know, acting attorney general phase, but they're bringing prosecutions and they're cracking down on people. They're moving the grand conspiracy case. They just hired Joe DeGenova to join that operation. I mean, they've got, he's doing so much great stuff in such a concentrated period of time right now that I'm wondering, I have been thinking, obviously part of this is just like the passage of time. Like he's arriving at the right time for all of this stuff to come to fruition. But part of me thinks like, what if Todd Blanch is just undergoing this big audition right now? Trying to prove to Trump that he's the guy for the job by being this kind of aggressive. It almost makes me want him to stay as acting AG for a long time. Why don't we just keep him in this sort of like middle ground role where he's constantly trying to impress the president of the United States and by extension us, the American voter. Might be good. And also for those of you in Florida, you probably want Ron DeSantis down there. Oh, that's right. Yeah, the Supreme Court, Lisa Allen said that. Lisa Allen 13, that's right. That was the other rumor this week, is that he would love to be on the United States Supreme Court. He's an attorney, DeSantis is. Could be very good. I mean, yeah, it could be very good in the event that the president has to pick a new Supreme Court justice. A lot of rampant speculation about, you know, is Sam Alito gonna retire? And at what point does Justice Thomas retire? If those things happen, it could be important to get a guy like Ron DeSantis in. And you gotta think about the math that President Trump is dealing with right now, and the Supreme Court for that matter. The guys on the court, the Alitos, the Thomases, the guys who really care about our country. What are they thinking here? Because one, it'd be great to have them around forever, but truth is, none of us can live forever. None of us can live forever. At some point, you gotta check out. And when do you go? Right now, we have a Republican Senate. The odds of keeping a Republican Senate are actually relatively high, despite what you're hearing in the media. We do have a very good shot of keeping and even growing the Republican Senate this year, which is what you need for a Supreme Court confirmation. You know, is there an electoral advantage to having a vacancy on the court? Maybe it could backfire. You could inspire the left to show up like crazy to the polls to stop a Supreme Court justice from emerging. That could happen. So that's the kind of math they're doing behind the scenes. Because remember, one of the big helpful reasons that President Trump got elected in the first place is Supreme Court picks. That's why people, there was a meaningful percentage of the population that voted for Trump because they needed a great pick for that Supreme Court vacancy. That was Mitch McConnell's last great achievement, insofar as he's had them, in helping us keep open a vacancy so that the president could fill it. So, yeah, no, there's a lot going on here. There's a lot going on here and we'll keep your eyes on that. But I know those of you in Florida, you love Ron DeSantis as governor. My parents are down in Florida. My dad, you know, general colonized down in Florida. He loves Ron DeSantis down there. They love having him as governor. So, you know, but you can't have everything. You can't have everything. Sometimes you gotta make a trade off for your country. So maybe he is a good pick. We'll see. It's up to the president on that one. In the United States Senate, I wanna bring you now to an update on the Save America Act. What's going on with that? Is that gonna happen? Are we gonna gavel in today? Sure, we are. Here we go. Save America Act today. There's some chatter right now. Senator John Kennedy says he's gonna put Save America Act priorities into the reconciliation package. Yeah, I'm sure. I'll believe it when I see it. I don't think we'll see it because I don't think it can survive being a part of the budget process. We've talked about this quite a bit. But there was an article this week from an outfit called Punch Bowl. And it was about how John Thune is trying to navigate this world where Republicans like you and like the conservatives like us want to save America Act passed. And John Thune doesn't know how to deal with you. John Thune is overwhelmed by you. And so Punch Bowl's got this piece. They say it's a multi-front pile up for John Thune. And they say Thune is dealing with a MAGA onslaught over the Save America Act. A MAGA onslaught. You see that, ladies and gentlemen? You're a part of a MAGA onslaught. Congratulations to the onslaughters out there. It's a relentless push to gut the filibuster. And an Iranian war that's exacerbating affordability concerns, they say. It's giving Democrats new ammo, unique set of challenges, yada, yada, yada. And then here's John Thune. They've got their limitations and so do we. So we've just got to figure it out. Inside the conference, the Save America Act is a touchy subject, is a touchy subject. The bill, which requires photo ID and proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections, this is bare minimum stuff, doesn't have a path to passage, says Punchbowl flatly. That's not true. It would have a path to passage if you guys would find your nuts and pass it. If we would establish a little bit of testicular fortitude, boom, we could pass this thing. But you lack that. They've gone through a bunch of gender-affirming surgeries in the Senate Republican Conference, which has prevented them from having the testicular fortitude to do this job. But that hasn't stopped some Senate Republicans, namely Senator Mike Lee. Mike Lee, oh, that Mike Lee, what a menace that Mike Lee is. Mike Lee, oh no, he's so scary. Mike Lee, he's been ginning up anger at Thune among MAGA followers online. Thune decided to hold a prolonged floor debate as a way to placate conservatives. You see this? What did I tell you they were doing? Headpats, placation, there you go, Sonny, we talked about it. And indirectly try to prove that their preferred method of passing the bill, the so-called talking filibuster, was unrealistic. Was unrealistic. Trump made it even harder for Thune. Oh, that Trump, he's so dastardly. By injecting an issue into the debate, restricting mail-in ballots that deeply divides Republicans. Why does it deeply divide Republicans? Is anybody asking these questions? Why in the hell would making mail-in ballots believable, credible, legitimate, why would it divide Republicans, you psychopaths? Democrats led by Senator Alex Padilla exploited those divisions. Remember Padilla? Remember Padilla? He tried to assault Kristi Noem. He charged the stage and he got tackled. Then he tried to turn himself into the victim. Big Jussie Smollett event. Suddenly, any attempt at a messaging vote to make Democrats look unreasonable for opposing voter ID was no longer as effective. A messaging vote. We don't want a messaging vote.

Speaker 3:
[43:29] We want a real vote.

Speaker 1:
[43:31] Yet Thune on Monday said the Senate might return to the controversial bill after reconciliation. Why is it controversial? You see how I have to read these dumb stories? I read through them and then I'm like, what does that mean? What are you talking about? Why are you trying? People say it's pronounced Padilla. That's not true. That's incorrect. This is officially Padilla, ladies and gentlemen. I, where did this start? This Padilla thing? Yes, there are people out there whose names are Padilla. That's true. This guy's name is Padilla. It's Padilla, okay? Just to be super clear. Don't mess it up. Okay. They say here, it's unclear whether MAGA World and Lee, who is calling for nuking the filibuster to pass save, would be satisfied with an additional floor debate. Here's the GOP Center. This is the quote. Ready? John is playing footsie with MAGA on the save act. He's playing footsie with you. I don't want to play footsie with fricking John Thune. I don't want to play footsie. Not interested in footsie. Footsie, we did that when we was footsie. Footsie was like, you know, 10 years old. When were you playing footsie? You're not playing footsie now. Footsie is over. We're not interested in footsie. We want you to pass the freaking save act. No more footsie. John is playing footsie with MAGA on the save act, said a random Republican Senator. Nothing he does will ever satisfy them. Them meaning you. Nothing John Thune does will ever satisfy you. Is that true? Nothing John Thune could ever do would satisfy you? That's not true. There is something he could do that would satisfy me. Pass the freaking save act. No footsie. Pass the bill. Nothing he does will ever satisfy them, said a Republican Senator who is granted anonymity to the declare, excuse me, to deliver a candidate assessment. Why are we carrying on with this charade? Said a Republican Senator anonymously, like a bitch, to punch bowl. Why are we carrying on with this charade? I'll tell you why. Because we want it. Because the American people want it. We're sick of your crap. Yes, that's right, cutesy time is over, says Carnage 25. Cutesy time is over. We want this. And we know you exist, you anonymous Republican Senator. We know people like you exist. This is the source of our great frustration. That we have to fight the Democrats, and then we have to fight some untold number of establishment Republicans who have such a low regard for their own base that they engage in efforts to pat us on the head and placate us and get us to go away, so that they can get back to the business of corruption rather than to the business of the American people. Making America great again also means making the Republican Party great again. We have to clean it out. We have to do a controlled burn. Mike Lee, to his credit, is also outraged by this. He reacted to this quote, It's a charade. The Save America Act is a charade. Protecting our elections is not a charade. It is a priority. Here's Mike Lee uncorking on this anonymous senator and pegging whoever it is for exactly the kind of person he is.

Speaker 6:
[47:22] Watch. Supposedly, one of my colleagues called the effort to pass the Save America Act in the Senate a charade. Well, my guess is that whoever said that but didn't have the guts to put their name to it is somebody who's a cosponsor of the Save America Act who openly, actively tells his constituents that he's a cosponsor of the Save America Act and maybe even tells donors that in order to raise funds. Regardless, this isn't going away. I'm not going away. This thing's not a charade. And I'm doubling down on this. I'm going to work twice as hard just because you said that, whoever you are.

Speaker 1:
[48:05] Something has happened in Mike Lee's psyche. I don't know if you've noticed it too. Mike Lee has reached a new level of aggression here because he is getting frustrated at unseen levels. Mike Lee is, he's kind of, he's such an even-killed guy. He's a fighter, but he's even-killed. He's always just sort of down here. Something lately has him ticked off at an unseen level. And I love it. I love the energy. Not because I love that he has to be ticked off. I just love that he's in the fight and that he's staying on this bone. John Thune does not want Mike Lee doing this. The last thing this goon anonymous Senator wants is Mike Lee getting out there and releasing more messages to the public about what the inner workings of the United States Senate are right now. The Senate has gone for years without you knowing, or at least to the extent that they could suppress it, trying to hide how they actually function internally. And now the guts are all over the place. Like we can see everything. And we're watching this and going, no, no, no, we're going to clean this up. We're your parole officers now. We're going to hover over your every action. We're going to keep an eye on what you're up to until you actually do what you're supposed to. And so here's Mike Lee. Mike Lee, a guy not that long ago thought like, we have to preserve the filibuster. We've got to preserve the rights of the minority in the Senate. This is like really important. He's done with this because he sees the writing on the wall. This is what we were talking about yesterday in the wake of the Virginia vote. You have to recognize what time it is. If you fail to recognize the time that's on America's clock right now, then you need to get the hell out of the way. Here he is saying, it's done. I don't care what it takes. We either use the talking filibuster, we blow up the zombie filibuster as he calls it, the silent filibuster. I don't care. By any means necessary, we have to get this done. Do something. Cut four, Mike Lee, watch.

Speaker 6:
[50:01] Senate Democrats are using unprecedented obstruction and use of the zombie filibuster in order to get their priorities. It's working well for them. You know, they got all the departments and agencies and the federal government funded that they like, but then somehow they refuse utterly to cooperate on any spending bill that would fund the Department of Homeland Security. So we're having to reinvent the wheel, go through a very elaborate process just to fund this one department whose success is material and indispensable to our national security and to President Trump's agenda. We're having to go through this process that actually takes weeks to complete just so we can pass it with a simple majority of votes. Here is the problem. All this is a symptom of our refusal to enforce the talking filibuster. If we were to enforce the talking filibuster, we could exhaust them and get to the point where they either provide us with the 60 votes we need or they get lazy, they get sloppy, they exhaust themselves, and eventually we would find a way to get it passed. For willing to do that, great. It's probably the way we ought to do it. It protects debate to use the talking filibuster. But if we're not willing to use the talking filibuster, it's time to nuke it. Why? Look, this zombie filibuster thing that we're using, which is sort of the opposite of what the filibuster is supposed to do and supposed to be, not only is there obstruction with it, unprecedented of late and causing all sorts of problems, but it's inuring disproportionately to the benefit of the Democrats. Not something we want to be doing. In these rare and often fleeting moments when we've got Republican control of the Senate, of the House and of the White House. So let's either enforce the talking filibuster or nuke the zombie filibuster. You can't have it both ways. Let's get this done. We will continue running around this like it's just on a hamster wheel until we fix the problem. I don't really care that much which, I'd rather enforce the talking filibuster, but if we're not willing to do the hard work of that, for the love of Pete, let's nuke it.

Speaker 1:
[52:02] You know, when the filibuster was founded, as Mike Lee clearly was getting out there, the whole point of that cloture vote, achieving a level of support in the Senate that would allow the bill to be passed in the first place, to go to an actual vote, the whole reason was to create the conditions for robust debate. That's what the filibuster was supposed to be. This is why it exists. It's for extended debate on the subject, so that you could cobble together consensus in the Senate around the legislation and then put it to an up or down vote. Yes or no, do you support this legislation? That is not the current state of the filibuster. The current state of the filibuster is no debate at all. That bills don't even see the light of day. That it's a perfect perversion, a perfect inversion of what the Senate is supposed to be doing in its legislative business. Screw that, hell with that. And so any person who is there to protect the institution, you're sabotaging the institution by destroying debate. You're sabotaging it by not allowing legislation to even be considered. And you're sabotaging the institution in order to protect yourselves and your own political careers and reputations. And the reason I say that is because the filibuster, the silent filibuster in its current form, has been a convenient way for senators not to have to engage with politically sensitive legislation. Anything that they think might blow back on them for having to deal with it all. The reality is in the Senate, both parties have been very comfortable with the silent filibuster because they love not having to put their name on the record in any capacity because they want the voters to view them as merely a blank slate. They don't really want a record for voters to dwell on. That's the last thing that they want. So all of these like politically sensitive things, they try and hide from it. That's it. And so don't tell me you're protecting the institution of the Senate by upholding the silent filibuster. You're betraying the entire institution, which is another way of saying you're betraying the country. You're betraying the purpose that the founders arranged in the first place in the Constitution. It's gross. And so Mike Lee is right to fight here. And I'm glad to see staying on that hamster wheel. It's super important that he does that. Super, super important that he does that. Finally, in the United States Senate yesterday, you want some fun stuff out of the Senate yesterday? I can show you some fun stuff. Let's get some fun stuff here before we depart the program today. RFK Jr. was testifying yesterday before the Senate. And he was subjected to a lot of stupid questions from Democrats. And among them was Senator Tina Smith, who tried to turn the HHS booting people off of federal benefits into a scandal. And RFK said, yeah, those are illegal aliens. They should be cut off. Here's that exchange yesterday with Tina Smith. RFK, talking about a great guy in the administration. Watch this.

Speaker 7:
[55:23] Recommending zeroing out funding for Title X, which would eliminate screenings for cervical cancer and would almost certainly result in higher unintended pregnancies.

Speaker 8:
[55:36] Can I respond to some of your earlier statements?

Speaker 7:
[55:39] Please.

Speaker 8:
[55:40] First of all, there are no cuts in Medicaid. I keep saying this. Here's what the CBO said. Fiscal year 2025, $668 billion. Fiscal year 2036, $981 billion. That's not a cut.

Speaker 7:
[55:56] Mr. Secretary Kennedy, a trillion dollars in cuts, according to the CBO. Seven million people losing their health insurance because of the Trump administration actions. That's not debatable.

Speaker 8:
[56:08] There's nobody who is legally enrolled in Medicaid who is losing their health insurance.

Speaker 7:
[56:13] That's just not true. That is just not true.

Speaker 8:
[56:15] It is so. How can this be a cut?

Speaker 7:
[56:19] How else would you like to respond to my questions about why the administration is cutting preventative care?

Speaker 8:
[56:25] We're putting a lot of it is being returned to the states. We're doing a $667 billion block grant to the states for mental health and...

Speaker 7:
[56:36] My counties are asking why the cost shift to their taxpayers is happening at the same time... It's the federal taxpayers......the hospitals are going out of business, Secretary Kennedy.

Speaker 8:
[56:46] The states administer the programs better than we do. So we're giving the same money to the states to administer the program.

Speaker 7:
[56:53] That is not the way it is working.

Speaker 1:
[56:55] Thank you. What they're saying here, and you see Eric Doherty writes it on his ex-post, they're cutting off illegals. They're cutting out fraud. They're cutting off foreigners. And Democrats are trying to turn this into a scandal. Have you noticed that Democrats only freak out when their fraud is exposed? That all of their freakouts consist of exposing their fraudulent operations, the theft of taxpayer money. It's really amazing. Here's another great moment yesterday. This is with a ridiculous Senator, Ron Wyden, who tries to bring up the sexual abuse of children. He starts alleging that there's some sort of scandal happening under RFK. Jr. And RFK goes, You want to talk about the sex abuse of children? How about on the watch of your party under HHS? Take a look at this moment yesterday. Watch.

Speaker 3:
[57:42] That a three-year-old girl was sexually abused in a foster home at an agency that you oversee. Are you familiar with this?

Speaker 8:
[57:52] No, I am not.

Speaker 3:
[57:55] You're the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and it's in a national publication. And you didn't know that a three-year-old girl was being sexually abused on your watch?

Speaker 8:
[58:05] I can tell you there were tens of thousands of girls and boys who were sexually abused. The Biden administration lost 425,000 children, and you never complained.

Speaker 3:
[58:18] Whose job is it to inform you of something like this? Because this, to me, is an unconscionable case.

Speaker 8:
[58:25] Yeah, but why were you worried when he lost 425,000 children? Why are you suddenly worried?

Speaker 3:
[58:31] I read this in the newspaper.

Speaker 8:
[58:32] Why are you suddenly worried about sexual abuse of children now and trafficking when it was mass promoted under the Biden administration, where they gave 425,000 children to adults without identification?

Speaker 3:
[58:46] I'm answering the questions here, and this was in a national publication seen by millions of people, an unconscionable example of mistreatment of a 3-year-old, and you don't know anything about it.

Speaker 8:
[58:58] This is a selective indignation.

Speaker 3:
[59:00] I'm just going to say...

Speaker 8:
[59:01] It is very dishonest, Senator.

Speaker 3:
[59:02] We have been working on this for years.

Speaker 8:
[59:04] Why don't you help us find those children who are lost, still lost? We found 138,000.

Speaker 3:
[59:08] We're working on this right now, and we'll have additional opportunities to talk to you.

Speaker 4:
[59:14] I'm very unreal.

Speaker 1:
[59:16] Listen, he's like completely impervious to the English language. RFK keeps asking him like, what's the deal? What about the 425,000 children? What about the half million kids who went missing? What about all the kids who were sexually abused on the watch of the Biden administration? You said nothing, you incredible sack of crap. Look at this, like cadaver asking him questions and then pretending like he's not getting responses here. He's getting responses. He just doesn't like the responses because they expose the callous indifference of the left. It's always power politics. It's not about the well-being of kids. They abort a million of them a year and they try and do it at taxpayer expense. The last thing they care about is the well-being of children. And if they make it out of the womb, they try and groom them into believing that they're the opposite gender. Please, please spare us the moral indignation. Come on, nonsense stuff. I got a lot of stuff coming up today. We got it on the big national radio show. We'll do that noon Eastern time, noon to three. You can join me rumble.com/vince is where we do the show from one to three p.m. live. Go to thevinceshow.com to get your local radio listings. You can listen to all of our great affiliates all across the country. We got so many hundreds of options for you. And then today on Rumble, you got Dan Bongino's show rumble.com/bongino. That's live at 10 a.m. Eastern. And then you have rumble.com/haley, Haley with two Y's. Why? Because she's awesome. And she's live at noon Eastern on Rumble. You know, it's like, are there any shortage of good options for you? No, the answer is no. There are so many great options. I love having you here with me. We're gonna be back again with you tomorrow for a big Friday show. I can't wait for it. Again, if you get a chance today, cruise past a mirror, give yourself a wink and say, hey, good looking. You watched the Vince show this morning. It's great to see you today. I'll be back with you tomorrow.