title UNESCO World Heritage: Preserving the Best of Humanity

description Humanity’s created a lot of neat things over the eons and starting in the 1940s, the UN created an agency focused on preserving those things for the whole world and future people. But that mission is in danger of becoming only about branding and money.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

pubDate Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:00:00 GMT

author iHeartPodcasts

duration 2508000

transcript

Speaker 1:
[00:01] Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of IHeartRadio.

Speaker 2:
[00:11] Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and this is Stuff You Should Know. And this is a fairly rare edition where we do an episode that we decided to do within the last few episodes. We don't usually turn around that fast. Usually it's like seven to eight years.

Speaker 3:
[00:29] Yeah, this is a quick one, and Julia turned this around for us pretty statty. I just made that up.

Speaker 2:
[00:38] Sure, but I get it.

Speaker 3:
[00:39] I think everyone knows what we mean. But we're talking about Unesco World Heritage Sites. Unesco standing for, which I never knew. I'm glad I know this now, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, whom in 1972 drafted this treaty to preserve world heritage as a whole. Whether it's, as we'll see, like a place or a thing, and they even expanded later into like, you know, cultural processes and customs and traditions.

Speaker 2:
[01:14] Yeah, and that's where this idea came from. We were doing our episode on contortionism, and we found that Mongolia was turned down for getting world heritage protection for their contortionist history. They were like, what the H? So we started looking into this, and it is pretty interesting. One of the things that apparently is a fairly common misunderstanding is that if you have like a heritage site, like something is identified and labeled a world heritage site, that that is no longer sovereign territory in your country. Could not be wronger. That still belongs to you. But what's happened is that the world, essentially everybody who's a member of UNESCO has agreed to say like we want to preserve this in your country, it's yours, but it really, we're all agreeing that this belongs to humanity, because it's so important to human culture, so unique that we need to preserve it, and it takes more than just one country to preserve things like this. So we're all going to get together and take shared responsibility for this important part of human culture.

Speaker 3:
[02:21] Yeah. Also a little bit of protection, like you know you've got something valuable on your shelf there. We're all watching you as you juggle your way through the room.

Speaker 2:
[02:33] You want to leave it in mint condition.

Speaker 3:
[02:35] That's right. There's one quote here that I think kind of nails it is, it's things that have outstanding universal value. So it's the universality of it all, as far as needing to cherish and care for these things. And I think it's kind of a kind of a cool deal. I mean, some people might criticize it as a big sort of political thing to get tourist dollars headed your way. But I'm not so cynical. I think it's actually pretty great.

Speaker 2:
[03:02] Oh, I do too. I think it's good too. I think it's both though. I think the ideal of it is awesome. I think that in practice lately, it's-

Speaker 3:
[03:09] Yeah, agreed.

Speaker 2:
[03:10] In trouble. The thing is the idea that it was of outstanding universal value, I get that, again, is an ideal. But in practice, that is not always the case. And I draw your attention to the Uusduunkerke, which is horseback shrimp fishing in Belgium. And if that sounds obscure to you, you're right, because only 12 families practice this still. That is a protected and tangible heritage. That is not of universal value, although it is super interesting and I'm glad it's protected, because why not? But I just thought that that was- there's a lot of different things that contradict the idea that it's of universal value.

Speaker 3:
[03:51] Yeah, for sure. This all got started post-World War II after the world got together and decided to wreck everything again for the second time in about 30 years. And everyone kind of looked up and were like, geez, we lost a lot of museums and churches and monuments and entire cities sometimes, or huge portions of cities are just gone. And maybe we need, as a world nation, to get together and sort of start caring for these things a little bit more. So the UN kind of led the brigade on this and Unesco was formed in 1945. I think I said that 1972 was when the World Heritage Treaty or whatever came about. So Unesco was around quite a while before this came around. So starting in 1945 is when Unesco was formed and they basically started a campaign to start protecting these places from a few things. It's not always just like war that is definitely one of them, but also human development and natural disaster.

Speaker 2:
[04:58] Right, for sure. The first thing, I think they were really kind of focused on learning from like archaeology was a big thing they were into for a while, but it really started to take the shape that we understand it today. In 1959, when Egypt went to Unesco and said, hey man, like we want to build this dam, it's really important that we have a reservoir of water. But when we build the dam, there's a lot of like really old Egyptian, pharaonic, Arab dynastic monuments that are going to be underwater. So can you help us figure this out? And Unesco said, this is it. We've been waiting for this for 14 years.

Speaker 3:
[05:37] Yeah. They said, we need to raise some money. So they got about $80 million together and said, all right, let's move these two temples specifically to higher ground. So they moved, they disassembled these temples, moved them about 650 feet, which was higher and out of harm's way. And that sort of, like you said, that just sort of started this idea of like, wait a minute, we can get together and make great things happen and protect great places. And that kind of continued through the 60s until 1972, on November 16th, at their 17th General Conference, when they adopted the convention concerning the protection of world cultural and natural heritage, which culminated, the center of all that is basically this world heritage list.

Speaker 2:
[06:25] Yeah, and there was one other aspect of that 1959 Aswan Dam initiative, I guess. Dozens of countries like donated to make this happen. Like this was $80 million in 1959 dollars. This is a significant amount of money. Egypt was really the only country that was going to benefit from this, but countries around the world said, no, we want to help take responsibility for this because we think that these are that important. They transcend just Egyptian importance.

Speaker 3:
[06:55] Yeah, for sure. And that leads to the second part of that, what happened in 1972. There was the Heritage List and the Heritage Fund, and that fund, without money, none of this really matters that much. It takes a lot of dough sometimes to do things like this.

Speaker 2:
[07:11] Yeah, for sure. Because like you said, a lot of it's threatened and one of the big things is preservation, protection, and restoration. So that World Heritage Convention from 72, it created the World Heritage List. And now here finally, we have reached the actual modern incarnation of what Unesco is largely involved in or at least known for.

Speaker 3:
[07:32] That's right. As far as the nuts and bolts of it all goes, there is the World Heritage Committee, which is 21 member countries at this point, that are elected for six-year terms. And they're the ones that are sort of in charge of overseeing all this. The United States has been a member country before and not been a member country, depending on which politician is in the White House. You can probably figure that one out.

Speaker 2:
[07:55] Well, no, not surprising. There's some surprising dates in there, if you ask me.

Speaker 3:
[07:59] Yeah, but we're not in there now. I think when did we drop off?

Speaker 2:
[08:03] 2011?

Speaker 3:
[08:07] Yeah, but we were back on, then back off again in like 21, right?

Speaker 2:
[08:10] 2018.

Speaker 3:
[08:12] So 2018, okay. I can't get my years straight.

Speaker 2:
[08:16] That's because of COVID.

Speaker 3:
[08:18] So, you know, if you are, they call it hosting, but if you have a world heritage site in your country, you have to, you can't just say, give us all the money and don't worry about it after that. You have to provide annual reports. You have to deliver reports on like how the property is, the state of the property, any concerns like moving forward, basically kind of how things are going. And if you are a member country, you get the whopping sum of $4 million a year from the World Heritage Fund.

Speaker 2:
[08:49] Right.

Speaker 3:
[08:50] And that is, I mean, some of that is preservation, but I get the feeling a lot of that is like just sort of functioning and identifying places and promoting your own World Heritage sites.

Speaker 2:
[09:00] Yeah, probably paying for docents is a chunk of that too.

Speaker 3:
[09:04] Yeah, probably so.

Speaker 2:
[09:06] But also if something happens, acute disaster from human or natural causes, you'll get some emergency assistance. And then this is another big one that I think probably really comes in handy. There are experts who work at Unesco who can train your staff, right? You don't have to reinvent the wheel every time and be like, this is an archaeological site. Let's figure out how to train you, the staff, to preserve it and explain it and all that stuff. You can send them off to, I guess, New York and have them trained up to do those things.

Speaker 3:
[09:39] Yeah, for sure. And tourism, it's a big deal. If you get one of your, if you are a country when you have a site that you get put on this list, it's a big deal because people, I think, that don't know a ton about this kind of look at it as like a seven wonders of the world list in some ways and like, oh, here's a place like we got to visit before we die.

Speaker 2:
[09:59] Yeah, there's hundreds of wonders of the world as far as the World Heritage List is concerned.

Speaker 3:
[10:04] Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[10:05] So, originally, Chuck, there were just like physical places and features that were on the World Heritage List called sites. And they were divided essentially into two categories, cultural or natural. And you can kind of generally guess what the criteria was for each.

Speaker 3:
[10:25] Yeah, like if it's a natural heritage site, that means there's just universal value, maybe scientifically or maybe even just aesthetically. You know, we're talking about the Great Barrier Reef of Australia or Serengeti National Park in Tanzania, stuff like that. And it's about protecting these natural wonders of the world generally.

Speaker 2:
[10:50] Yeah, and I mean, we just take for granted that the Serengeti National Park is like amazing. But the reason why specifically it was chosen is because it's one of the best examples of large predator-prey interactions. Like you just do not see lions chasing down antelope in Kansas. You don't see it unless the zoo's gone crazy. And that's one reason why it's protected. It's basically the main reason why it's protected. But then there's also an intersecting thing too that it's also gorgeous. So this fulfills a couple of things. It's biologically important to science, but it's also aesthetically amazing too.

Speaker 3:
[11:26] Yeah, for sure. And this goes, you know, every single one of these things. We're not just going to go through and list a ton of different places. But if you're talking about the Yellowstone National Park or the Galapagos Islands, or like I mentioned, the Great Barrier Reef, these all seem like pretty obvious inclusions.

Speaker 2:
[11:42] For sure, and they were probably included pretty early on in the list's existence.

Speaker 3:
[11:47] Oh, geez.

Speaker 2:
[11:48] So that's the natural site. There's also the cultural site. And these are essentially, you know, human-made environments or structures or places of human occupation, where humans did something impressive, important, or it was just part of a larger culture. For example, there's a crossroads and I think, oh, I don't remember where it was, but it was just a crossroads back in the third century CE. And it was just really important at the time. It doesn't seem all that important now, but it was and you want to preserve it because future generations can learn from it and experience it and appreciate it.

Speaker 3:
[12:29] Yeah, for sure. And it can also be a building or a sculpture, like the Statue of Liberty is on there under cultural heritage, under that. But so is like Venice, Italy. So it can be a whole city that's sort of an ancient, modern, well, maybe not ancient, but a modern wonder, you know?

Speaker 2:
[12:48] Right. And then it can be ancient, too. And then also like how the aesthetics and scientific importance intersect in the Serengeti National Park. That can happen in cultural sites, too. Like it can be where archaeology and intersects with, you know, humans like making, shaping the natural environment. Like the Cahokia Mountains are on the list.

Speaker 3:
[13:14] Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[13:14] To where like all these different boxes can be checked. And those are, they call the money sites, where there's just a bunch of different criteria going on.

Speaker 3:
[13:26] Yeah. And when I said not ancient, I meant Venice specifically.

Speaker 2:
[13:29] I see. I see. Have you been to Venice?

Speaker 3:
[13:31] I've never been there. It's a big time on the list. But I also just realized I don't know when all that was engineered.

Speaker 2:
[13:39] I want to say like the 16th century, but it could be later.

Speaker 3:
[13:43] Is that ancient? That's not ancient.

Speaker 2:
[13:44] That's ancient-ish.

Speaker 3:
[13:46] No, I don't even know what ancient means now that I think about it.

Speaker 2:
[13:48] But you're going to love it. You will love Venice. And when you do go there, go to Harry's Bar. It's where the Bellini was invented.

Speaker 3:
[13:57] Okay, love the Bellini.

Speaker 2:
[13:58] They save Hemingway's seat, like at the bar. It's preserved. But their martinis are really, really good. They're outrageously expensive just because they know that you'll pay it because you're a tourist, but it's still worth getting.

Speaker 3:
[14:13] Well, maybe I can grow the beer back out and put some weight back on and convince everyone I'm the ghost of Hemingway and take that seat finally.

Speaker 2:
[14:20] We'll bring a multi-extra toad cat with you. Or are they cross-eyed? What is it about those cats?

Speaker 3:
[14:26] I don't know. Are they polydactyl?

Speaker 2:
[14:29] I think so. There's some unique feature that the Hemingway cats on Key West all share. I want to say it's an extra toe. I'm not sure.

Speaker 3:
[14:41] Well, moving on, we'll figure that out. There are a total of 1,248 World Heritage sites right now. The vast amount of those are cultural, I think 78%, 19% are natural, and 3% are mixed, and Europe and North America have almost half of them. They have 46% compared to Latin and the Caribbean. Latin America and Caribbean at 12%, Asia and the Pacific 25%, the Arab states 8%, and Africa 9%, although we should say Africa holds 20% of all the natural sites, which is pretty impressive and not surprising.

Speaker 2:
[15:18] That is cool. I say we take a break, but first I also wanted to point out that not all of these are just like up with humanity. They also preserve some pretty dark stuff too. One good example is the Navy School of Mechanics in Argentina, which has turned into a site of memory, a museum where they basically preserved the fact that this was a place where people were abducted, tortured, and murdered by dictatorships in Latin America in the 1970s and 80s. And this is a world heritage site because it's important to remember, people will do this. Like people will vote people like this into office and keep them there, and those people can turn on their own people, and you can be abducted and disappeared and murdered by the state. That happens. That to me is like one of the big driving, I guess it drives home the point of the world heritage list more than some of these others.

Speaker 3:
[16:16] Right.

Speaker 2:
[16:17] To remember.

Speaker 3:
[16:17] Not just pretty things.

Speaker 2:
[16:18] Right. But you don't have to just remember the dark stuff, you can remember all of the stuff, but you can't ignore the dark stuff, I guess is what I mean.

Speaker 3:
[16:26] Well said, just like Lord Vader himself.

Speaker 2:
[16:30] What do you say, like, come on over, baby, the dark side is feeling great.

Speaker 3:
[16:34] I think so. That was the line. Should we take that break?

Speaker 2:
[16:38] Yeah, I think we should. All right.

Speaker 3:
[16:40] We'll be right back, everybody. All right, so we mentioned early, we're back by the way, that Unesco would eventually adopt stuff like oral traditions and performing arts and social rituals and practices and things like that. That happened in 2003 specifically. And this was a very valuable ad, I think, like a skillset or a knowledge or just some irreplaceable custom or traditional craft or skill or something that could be in danger of being lost if not for stuff like this.

Speaker 2:
[17:33] Yeah. And again, it can be 12 families shrimp fishing on horseback in Belgium.

Speaker 3:
[17:38] I want to see that. What does that look like?

Speaker 2:
[17:42] It looks like somebody with a horse and a shrimp net on a beach. I saw a picture of it.

Speaker 3:
[17:49] I mean, I kind of figured that, but I bet the shrimp are good.

Speaker 2:
[17:53] But I think it's worth preserving too, because this is important to these people. It's not saying, this is what America thinks is cool, or this is what Zimbabwe thinks is cool. This is important to this culture. There's a culture on planet Earth, and this is important to them, and we should preserve it just for that very reason. Plus also really, what is supporting horseback shrimp fishing among 12 families in Belgium, really costing the world to support? Yeah.

Speaker 3:
[18:22] Agreed. One part about being included on this part of the list is that, and I think this is kind of cool, is it can be inherited from the past, but it also is applied to a contemporary setting. So that means it can't be the lost art of whatever, if it's truly really no one is even doing this at all anymore. You can be delisted, and we're going to talk about that in a minute. Not delisted as in D dash, but D E dash.

Speaker 2:
[18:50] Oh, so you know that site? Well, no.

Speaker 3:
[18:53] Wasn't that a TV show?

Speaker 2:
[18:55] I don't know. There's a really mean like burn blog, or there used to be called delisted. That was hilarious, but also really cruel.

Speaker 3:
[19:04] No, I was never on that. But if you are included, that means this practice or this ritual or custom is passed through generations and communities, and very community based overall. Like it's recognized within that community and outside that community is something of value. Kind of like the shrimp people. Shrimp people.

Speaker 2:
[19:27] Just because it's interesting, you know?

Speaker 3:
[19:29] Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[19:30] Let's talk about, we dug up some other ones. You want to just kind of throw a few of these out? I found basically all these interesting, but we should probably just pick some.

Speaker 3:
[19:38] Yeah, I'll go with the bagpipes. Bulgarian bagpipe making and bagpipe playing, apparently is a very big thing in Bulgaria, passed down through the families for generations, and it used to be like a father-to-son thing. Now they will teach all genders, which is kind of great. It's in social clubs, they teach it in schools, and they're like, we need to protect this, and it is on that list.

Speaker 2:
[20:01] It's also, there's some very famous ones too, that it's not just as obscure as horseback shrimp fishing. Artisanal baguette making in France is protected. Turkish coffee is protected. Sauna culture in Finland is protected.

Speaker 3:
[20:15] Yeah, baby.

Speaker 2:
[20:15] Gingerbread crafting in Croatia. And then it does get a little more niche, loin cloth weaving and Cote d'Ivoire. Human tower creation, they're called castles in Spain, to where people just stack up on other people. And then there's also an annual grass mowing competition in Bosnia-Herzegovina, and it is using a scythe. They're not just like riding John Deere tractors or anything like that. And it's exactly what it sounds like. It's a grass mowing competition. That's protected. Also, so is yodeling in Switzerland.

Speaker 3:
[20:51] Yeah, great list.

Speaker 2:
[20:53] Thank you. So Chuck, I don't know if you said there's a danger list. Did you mention that? I don't think we have yet.

Speaker 3:
[21:00] No, I talked about being delisted, but before you're delisted, you can be in danger.

Speaker 2:
[21:05] Yeah, and you can be in danger from, we did kind of talk about it. You can be in danger from armed conflict, war. From climate change, from all, like just a complete change of the surrounding area can get you delisted. And danger is where this is the step before delisting. And essentially, Unesco steps in and says, hey, we need to do something about this because this site is deteriorating or we need to figure out how to lift the Statue of Liberty 100 feet so that sea level rise doesn't wash it away. And there's two kinds. There's ascertain danger, which is like this is going to happen. And then there's potential danger, like say stuff coming from climate change, or if it's a civil conflict is starting to heat up and it looks like a civil war is going to break out. And there's a heritage site right in the crossfire.

Speaker 3:
[21:59] Yeah, for sure. And one good example of something they might do is they are these national parks. And I guess they're all national parks in the Democratic Republic of Congo that was, they were all made the danger list between 94 and 97. So they kind of put up the warning flag and Unesco came in with their fat bank account. There were some NGOs involved that wanted to get involved and donate some money and they had a four-year rehabilitation campaign for these parks. And then a second campaign, this kind of goes to show how the international community comes together. These are all in the Democratic Republic of Congo. But in 2004, the second campaign got funded from Belgium and Japan. They're like, let's take care of these places.

Speaker 2:
[22:47] Yeah. There's another site, the remains of Bamyan Valley in Afghanistan is what it's called. It went from not on any World Heritage List immediately to the danger list. The Taliban back in 2001 blew up these two, I think 10 and 15 story tall cliff-carved statues or reliefs of Buddha from the 6th century. They were beautiful. The Taliban blew them up by shooting them with shoulder rocket launchers that were probably provided by the CIA back in the 80s when they were fighting the Russians. This was an enormous thing. People were like, what are you doing? What is the problem here? This is part of this kind of ethnic cleansing campaign against the Hazara people who live in the area. I guess Unesco was like, we can't let anything like that happen again. Let's get in here and try to preserve this valley. It was put on the danger list and they started a campaign in 2009 to just basically go in there and figure out how to move forward and keep this valley from getting worse off than it was.

Speaker 3:
[23:59] Yeah, I think land mines there is a big deal. So part of their, you know, Unesco getting involved there is identifying and getting rid of those land mines, first and foremost.

Speaker 2:
[24:08] Yep. Let's see.

Speaker 3:
[24:10] Everglades National Park, Florida's treasure, that's on there.

Speaker 2:
[24:14] Yeah.

Speaker 3:
[24:15] Very sadly on the danger list.

Speaker 2:
[24:16] Yeah, there's also like civil conflicts really, target stuff or in danger sites like the historic center of Odessa and Ukraine is on the list. Ancient Aleppo in Syria is on the list. Yeah, that's a big, it seems like armed conflict and climate change are the two biggest threats to world heritage sites.

Speaker 3:
[24:41] Yeah, I think so. You know, we did talk about being delisted, and thankfully, that's only happened a few times because if you're deleted from the list, that means like, that means you're probably done as a thing and that like there's no point in protecting you anymore because it doesn't exist. And one good example of that is the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City. It was delisted in 2021. This was the historic docklands of Liverpool, very big, you know, port town, obviously, in England and they built a stadium there. Everton Stadium was built and it was, it basically kind of wiped all that out. So they were like, well, there's no reason for this being on the list anymore.

Speaker 2:
[25:23] Yeah, the Tower of London is not on the danger list, but it's on the pre-danger list for the same reason, the development that's going on in the area threatens to basically take away its natural or historic, I mean, identity. Even just being built around. They're not talking about knocking down the Tower of London, but just building around it can change the built environment enough that Unesco is like, it's done.

Speaker 3:
[25:50] Yeah, sometimes it's very sad in this case in Oman, the Arabian Oryx Sanctuary was delisted in 2007 that had a population of Arabian Oryx Antelope, and that was decimated so much, that population, it was such that I believe it fell down to like 65 of them in 2007. And I guess that was, and this was because of poaching, obviously, and habitat destruction, which makes it super sad. But I guess that was low enough to where they were like, all right, you know, no more protection from us.

Speaker 2:
[26:22] I know, and that's sad because it seems like that's when they should swoop in and be like, we're going to occupy this area, Oman, we are, this is no longer sovereign Oman.

Speaker 3:
[26:32] Yeah, I mean, I think there are other organizations that do and protect species like that, so hopefully they weren't just sort of left out in the wind.

Speaker 2:
[26:40] Yeah, I mean, I'm sure that they were on the danger list first and then they just didn't follow through. But that's, that we should say, it's not a, it's pretty dishonorable for a country to let one of its sites end up on the danger list, even worse to have it delisted. So countries tend to work hard to get off of the danger list. And that does actually happen. That happened in 2025 to three different spots. The rainforest of Atsananana in Madagascar, Abu Mena in Egypt, think that was the crossroads. And then in the old town of Gadamis in Libya, that was the crossroads. It was the crossroads between Africa and the Mediterranean a couple thousand years ago. But those were all, for different various reasons, on the danger list, and those countries worked very hard and aggressively to address all of those issues and get them back off of the danger list. So it is possible to get off the danger list and certainly not be delisted. And usually countries who take this stuff seriously will work hard to do that.

Speaker 3:
[27:54] Yeah, you don't want to be on the naughty list.

Speaker 2:
[27:56] Exactly.

Speaker 3:
[27:57] Earlier when you said crossroads, I thought, genuinely thought, you were going to say the Mississippi crossroads where Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil.

Speaker 2:
[28:07] Do they have that one crossroad identified?

Speaker 3:
[28:10] I don't know.

Speaker 2:
[28:12] It sure seems like it should be a World Heritage Site.

Speaker 3:
[28:15] Yeah, I don't know. I'm not sure if they have the actual crossroads or if it's more of a, not apocryphal, but, or maybe it is apocryphal.

Speaker 2:
[28:25] It could be both.

Speaker 3:
[28:27] Yeah, or ephemeral. Could be all three.

Speaker 2:
[28:29] Right. Have we taken our second break? I don't think we have, have we?

Speaker 3:
[28:35] No, let's take our, it's perfect timing. Look at us, 30 minutes in.

Speaker 2:
[28:38] Okay, we'll be right back. So Chuck, politics plays a huge part in Unesco and the World Heritage List. You would probably not be surprised to think because this is a bunch of different nations coming together, and they don't always play super well together, or when they do play super well together, it's often like gaming the system. And that seems to be what is going on today with Unesco and the World Heritage Convention, that it's basically been creeping slowly toward a way for countries to make more money through their tourism industry. Get some sites on the World Heritage List, you can go promote it worldwide and bring more people to your country where they're going to spend a bunch of drachmas.

Speaker 3:
[29:42] Yeah, for sure. There is a professor of anthropology at Stanford named Lynn Meskel, who basically said, it's entirely about political and economic gain at this point, just a tool in a much larger arsenal of nation-state politics. The politics of it all can't be ignored these days. There's an interesting thing that happens in terms of repatriation. We talked at some point here and there about when there's plundering from wars and things like that and all of a sudden, the countries own things or at least have possession of them and place them in museums. They weren't there to begin with, like giving this stuff back. There's a big movement for that, but there's also this idea on the other side of like, well, we will take care of that stuff because it is in London or New York City. We're not going to give it back to you. And that same sort of mentality has been sort of, the same thing has sort of applied to world heritage sites, I think, a little bit where indigenous peoples are kind of moved out of the conversation because the attitude is like, well, you just don't know what's best for your stuff.

Speaker 2:
[31:00] Right. It's kind of like if you're a bunch of Westerners coming along as tourists to tour this world heritage site that's of immense cultural value to this local group, if current people from the local group show up, they kind of push out of their way by their face and they're like, out of the way, you're ruining the diorama. This took place a thousand years ago. We don't care what's going on with you today, even though you're directly related to this, I think is that mentality, right?

Speaker 3:
[31:28] Yeah. That's a good way to say it, I think. Sadly.

Speaker 2:
[31:31] There's also like a whole, I talked about gaming the system. One of the ways that you can game the system is essentially withdraw, like the United States has done twice now, in the 80s and in 2018. You can withdraw from Unesco and this convention, but you can still nominate sites, including sites in your own country, right?

Speaker 3:
[31:53] Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[31:53] So you're getting the best of both worlds, where you can get those tourism dollars for getting new world heritage sites and you're also not paying dues, or you're not spending any of your own money to support other sites. But if you need help with your sites, because it's a world heritage site, you can get other countries money who are doing the right thing and paying their dues.

Speaker 3:
[32:17] Yeah, for sure. Not a cool thing to do, if you ask me. The other thing that they've seen, I think, kind of starting in the 1990s, it seems like, is when countries are getting together and voting together, like forming packs and voting blocks to either get listed or to block, maybe, a site from getting on the danger list, because we said that's kind of like being on the naughty list.

Speaker 2:
[32:42] Yeah, exactly. So, like, Latin American countries will frequently band together and vote in one another's best interests. Or also, I think, even countries that aren't members anymore, say the US., can basically be like, hey, vote for us for this thing and, you know, we'll make sure that we up our oil imports from your country by 10% or something.

Speaker 3:
[33:03] Oh, interesting.

Speaker 2:
[33:03] You know, so I think the more juice you have, the more you can get stuff done even if you're not a member anymore.

Speaker 3:
[33:10] Yeah, for sure. And, you know, like you said, this is big money. Like, if you're included on this list, they will, you'll be a part of their advertising campaign. And then you can also create your own around that, you know, touting inclusion, you know?

Speaker 2:
[33:23] Yeah, I can tell you that I want to go see the Minoan Palatial Centers in Greece, six Bronze Age sites that were part of the late Bronze Age collapse. They're about to be, or they were, just in 2025 put on. So the tourism's working already.

Speaker 3:
[33:40] So you might not have known about that had it not been included, probably?

Speaker 2:
[33:43] Yes, I did not know those sites existed.

Speaker 3:
[33:47] Yeah, I'm sure they have a robust website with lots of pretty pictures.

Speaker 2:
[33:51] So, yeah, and that's basically like being there in person, right? But it's free.

Speaker 3:
[33:56] Yeah, exactly. Speaking of the Danger List, there are a few sites that you can be removed from the Danger List. That's the goal, I guess, before being delisted. And that happened last year. The rainforest in Madagascar, the ones that you're talking about? Yeah, they're not on the Danger List. And then that town in Libya, was that where the Crossroads was?

Speaker 2:
[34:18] That's the Crossroads.

Speaker 3:
[34:20] So I guess what do you do? Do you just raise enough hay or prove that you're actually protecting it in such a way?

Speaker 2:
[34:28] Well, I'll give you the example of the Crossroads, the old town of Gametes, I believe, is what it is.

Speaker 3:
[34:35] Gatamese.

Speaker 2:
[34:35] Gatamese, thank you. Their irrigation techniques were raising the water table, and some of the very ancient buildings were in danger of crumbling from the water exposure. So Libya went in and basically came up with different irrigation techniques that they taught to the locals, lowered the water table, and now the site is no longer in jeopardy, and it's off of the danger list.

Speaker 3:
[34:59] All right.

Speaker 2:
[35:00] It's essentially just a question of the host country having the will to spend a few bucks to remedy the situation. That's all it is.

Speaker 3:
[35:11] I wonder if one member country has enough places like that make that danger list, if there's any sort of, maybe not even official penalty, but like, hey, listen, guys, you need to, you got three on the danger list now, you need to get it together.

Speaker 2:
[35:27] Exactly. It's a really bad look.

Speaker 3:
[35:30] It is a bad look.

Speaker 2:
[35:32] Kind of talking about the politics of this too, there was a really startling turn of events in 2020, where Recep Erdogan, the president of Turkey, unilaterally said, hey, the Hagia Sophia, this part of world heritage, it was a cathedral, and then a mosque, and now it's a museum, we're turning it back into a mosque. And Unesco is like, we didn't talk about this. And Erdogan said, it doesn't matter, we're doing that. And this is like, I mean, this thing was built in the 530s. It's one of the more amazing buildings in the world. And in the 1930s, a court in Turkey said, this is a museum, this is no longer a mosque, Turkey is secular, and that's all there is to it. So it's a museum until Erdogan came along in 2020 and changed it back. Yeah.

Speaker 3:
[36:23] And unilaterally decided this on his own. And Unesco was like, hey, not only did, you shouldn't have done this, but you didn't tell us you were doing this. And you're using this as like, this is a world heritage site now. You can't use it for your own political gain. You can't try and curry favor with the Islamic Turkish Conservatives. And he was like, well, you know, what'd he say? It's not a museum anymore. And we're not charging entry fees anymore?

Speaker 2:
[36:53] Yep.

Speaker 3:
[36:53] Was that his like comeback?

Speaker 2:
[36:56] I guess it was a comeback of sorts or a defense or something. He's like, you don't have to pay to get in anymore.

Speaker 3:
[37:02] Yeah, it was pretty weak.

Speaker 2:
[37:04] But that was 2020 and absolutely nothing happened. That's the other problem. This is a problem with almost everything that has to do with the UN. There's like, what are you going to do? Really?

Speaker 3:
[37:12] Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[37:13] Like, I'm fine. I don't care about peer pressure, the international community being mad at me. That's all it takes. And there's nothing that can be done about it.

Speaker 3:
[37:24] Yeah, for sure. Let me see, what else is on the danger list? You mentioned the Statue of Liberty, right? As far as some of the big dogs.

Speaker 2:
[37:32] Sea level rise.

Speaker 3:
[37:33] And of course the Great Barrier Reef. That's been threatened for a long time as our reefs all over the world, very, very sad.

Speaker 2:
[37:39] Ocean bleaching. Also, the Sydney Opera House is coming close to the danger list because of sea level rise as well.

Speaker 3:
[37:48] Oh man, it's right there on the water. You got to protect that thing.

Speaker 2:
[37:50] I know, man. I say we go out, I just want to throw out a couple more of these amazing intangible ones that are protected, okay?

Speaker 3:
[37:59] Great.

Speaker 2:
[38:00] Midwifery. From Germany to Togo, sometimes this can cross cultures. Midwifery is one of them.

Speaker 3:
[38:08] It should have been from Albania to Zaire. That's how you got to do those.

Speaker 2:
[38:12] That would have been great. Akhal Tiki horse breeding in Turkmenistan.

Speaker 3:
[38:20] Yeah, I like that one.

Speaker 2:
[38:21] Here's a good one. Ceviche preparation in Peru.

Speaker 3:
[38:25] I'm all about that.

Speaker 2:
[38:26] I am too. You'll also like this one, the Dia de los Muertos in Mexico, the Day of the Dead.

Speaker 3:
[38:33] Yeah, for sure. Hey, you know what? Here's a tip, especially for you and me and Emily. If you love that ceviche, you just gotta make sure, you gotta say no pulpo.

Speaker 2:
[38:44] Oh, really?

Speaker 3:
[38:45] Yeah, I think you don't need octopus, right?

Speaker 2:
[38:48] Oh, is that what that is? No, I definitely do not. They're too intelligent. It's cruel.

Speaker 3:
[38:51] Yeah, we learned that in Mexico City that pulpo was the word. So we were like, oh, okay. So that's what we need to avoid.

Speaker 2:
[38:57] So you say, hold the pulpo.

Speaker 3:
[39:00] Yeah, or just get the one without it.

Speaker 2:
[39:02] Okay.

Speaker 3:
[39:03] Like, I would never go to another country and say, can you not put this thing in there that you traditionally eat? Like, you can find a ceviche that's probably just a fish or shrimp or scallop or whatever.

Speaker 2:
[39:14] Oh, really? I feel like I take the Burger King approach to tourism where I was like, I'll have it my way.

Speaker 3:
[39:19] Oh, really?

Speaker 2:
[39:23] You got anything else?

Speaker 3:
[39:25] I got nothing else. This is a fun one. I know there's something I knew nothing about, and now I feel like I know enough, which is our charge as a show, to talk a little bit about it intelligently around a dinner table.

Speaker 2:
[39:36] And to attend Unesco World Heritage meetings and speak up.

Speaker 3:
[39:39] Yeah, where do they have those? New York?

Speaker 2:
[39:40] Yeah, let's go.

Speaker 3:
[39:42] All right.

Speaker 2:
[39:43] I'm sure anybody can just walk in. If you want to know more about Unesco World Heritage, go check out some sites. You can tour the world from your computer, again, for free. And in the meantime, I think it's time for listener mail.

Speaker 3:
[39:58] Yeah, this is from Stephen Cook from Halifax, Nova Scotia, who visited the Kowloon Walled City.

Speaker 2:
[40:07] Oh, cool.

Speaker 3:
[40:08] Or at least the park. Hey, guys, visited that Kowloon Walled City Park this past December on our first trip to Hong Kong, and it's a delightful spot with sports facilities for nearby residents, some remnants of the original building foundations as a reminder of its past, and the one original building that is now a museum. That's the one we talked about.

Speaker 2:
[40:26] Yeah.

Speaker 3:
[40:27] Plus, there's a special exhibit that recreates a streetscape in the community using sets from the 2024 film Twilight of the Warriors, Kowloon Walled In, which stars Hong Kong action legend Sam O-Hung as a local crime boss named Mr. Big. I guess when you're this big, they call you Mr. The set recreates a whole block with a barbershop, convenience store, shoe repair stand, and a fishball making factory. With period props and decor, a visit is highly recommended. Steven included a few photos, which are great.

Speaker 2:
[40:59] Oh, I can't wait to see this because I looked all over for the exhibit and I couldn't find any photos. I saw mention of it at some point. Yeah.

Speaker 3:
[41:07] Search that email, buddy, and it'll come up.

Speaker 2:
[41:09] Thanks, Steven. That's a great one. Yeah. If you have been to Kowloon Walled City, let us know. We want to hear from all of you. If you have anything to say really, even hi, right, Chuck?

Speaker 3:
[41:21] Hi and hello is a great thing to hear always.

Speaker 2:
[41:23] Yes. You can send it via email to StuffPodcasts at iheartradio.com.

Speaker 1:
[41:32] Stuff You Should Know is a production of IHeartRadio. For more podcasts, My Heart Radio, visit the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.