transcript

Speaker 1:
[00:00] Wow, Noodles, you don't say, but let's not talk about that on air. Welcome to The Line Up Live here on Rumble. YouTube Live is pretty much dead on its last legs. It's on life support. It's like in Canada on their cold call on YouTube asking if it wants to take itself out. Rumble did it. Figuratively, my gosh, when people say, hey, did you get what you voted for? SPLC, Southern Poverty Law Center, indicted. Many of you may not know the significance of this. If you're new, I see some people say these are scraps. These aren't the kind of things that we were voting for as far as the real arrests. Do you know how much of what you watch online and what speech is permitted? Do you know how much of that comes directly from the SPLC? I'm talking YouTube. I'm talking Facebook. I'm talking at one point Twitter before it became X. They were the go-to on determining hate speech. Turns out they were paying Klansmen. Turns out they actually paid the leaders for the Unite the Right rally. Turns out some of the biggest myths that you know about racists, which I've never met one. Have you met one? That's the question of the day. Turns out they're being paid by the SPLC. That's why they still exist. So I am incredibly excited about this. We'll take you down memory lane a little bit. Miss Rachel. I'm trying to think of how to... Lying Whore. Talking about ICE. Turns out she hasn't been there. Turns out everything she's saying is factually incorrect. And if you allow your children to watch Miss Rachel, you want them to turn into trans lesbian zombies. And then why all of the advice on the Call Her Daddy podcast is wrong. We talk about Zara Larsson today. On with the show.

Speaker 2:
[01:45] Now for a trip inside Trump World's Hall of Mirrors. Hey, Stephen, heads up. We're gonna need you in 15 for the TRIO pre-taping.

Speaker 1:
[01:53] Okay, thanks, Quarter Black.

Speaker 3:
[01:54] Oh yeah, and I put some extra mushrooms on that Swiss there for you.

Speaker 4:
[01:56] I know you like them some.

Speaker 1:
[01:57] Oh, thanks, man, I appreciate it.

Speaker 2:
[01:59] It made me wonder at the end of a long week, was this a lie too? But this, now, the Trump presidency, this is what a crisis of leadership looks and feels like. Hey, Quarter Black?

Speaker 1:
[02:10] Yeah?

Speaker 5:
[02:12] Have you seen these mushrooms again?

Speaker 2:
[02:14] From a fan. Rudy Giuliani. You see him there on Hannity. You feeling all right? Same for Dr.- Oh my God! Here it is by SNL, that's the present for-

Speaker 1:
[05:37] Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 999 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content, creators and free speech.

Speaker 4:
[06:27] Why? What are you doing?

Speaker 2:
[06:29] Come on.

Speaker 4:
[06:30] Why are you doing this?

Speaker 1:
[06:32] I choose not to work.

Speaker 4:
[06:33] Oh.

Speaker 1:
[06:38] Universal Host Income.

Speaker 3:
[06:43] Why would I, why would I, why would I do it?

Speaker 6:
[06:48] You, sir, are an asshole.

Speaker 4:
[06:53] Join MugClub, folks.

Speaker 3:
[06:54] Context.

Speaker 1:
[06:55] Well, I think we started the spirited debate yesterday on Universal Basic Income before we went to MugClub.

Speaker 7:
[07:02] I am not for it, okay?

Speaker 3:
[07:03] No, we didn't?

Speaker 4:
[07:03] Oh, okay.

Speaker 1:
[07:04] So then that makes zero sense to you if you're new. It went on for like an hour because, you know, Gerald, he says he's not, but he's kind of a socialist. Hey, Captain Morgan, CEO, how are you? I'm a little sick, yeah, so I need socialized health care, apparently. Well, you know, we'll get one of those death panels as quickly as we can. And Friday, Saturday, April 24th, 25th at Comedy Avenue in Lawton, Oklahoma, Mr. Josh Firestine.

Speaker 4:
[07:27] It's this week.

Speaker 1:
[07:28] Yeah.

Speaker 4:
[07:29] It's this week. It might become one show. I'm not sure. Tickets aren't great, but I am happy to be here with comrade Morgan.

Speaker 1:
[07:34] You know, I always forget that it's this week. I always forget that it's this week because I'm so used to saying the date. That's this week. Go to Lawton, Oklahoma.

Speaker 4:
[07:42] It's this week in Lawton's a small town full of wonderful people who aren't buying tickets, so.

Speaker 1:
[07:46] Well, don't just don't make your strategy to try to make people feel bad.

Speaker 4:
[07:50] Yeah.

Speaker 6:
[07:51] You want to pin it back?

Speaker 4:
[07:51] You guys should be guilty.

Speaker 1:
[07:52] Guys, go do it because the Universal Basic Income hasn't kicked in yet. No, no, Universal Basic Comedy.

Speaker 6:
[07:58] There we go.

Speaker 4:
[07:58] All right.

Speaker 6:
[07:59] All right.

Speaker 1:
[07:59] Speaking of comedy, Britain, England, it's a silly place. The only thing sillier than their stupid little country is their stupid little police. Play it.

Speaker 4:
[08:13] Give us your hands. The dog's doing a better job.

Speaker 8:
[08:21] The dog's doing some.

Speaker 1:
[08:22] There's the taser.

Speaker 9:
[08:24] He just made him mad.

Speaker 1:
[08:25] Yeah, no kidding.

Speaker 4:
[08:27] Brought him back to life.

Speaker 1:
[08:29] And by the way, I have an explanation as to why this doesn't. That guy is just panicked.

Speaker 3:
[08:36] I'm going to hit it with the rubber stick.

Speaker 1:
[08:38] It didn't work.

Speaker 4:
[08:39] I hit you with my baton.

Speaker 3:
[08:40] Stop. He must jog. Oh, he just jogged past that f-wall.

Speaker 1:
[08:49] It looks like Super Mario World.

Speaker 3:
[08:50] I want him to phone out. What's up with that?

Speaker 9:
[08:52] I want him to video it.

Speaker 3:
[08:54] Oh, my word.

Speaker 1:
[08:57] Who would have thought that in 2005, when we rolled out the Axion Taser 10, that went down to 1,000 volts when it was previously 50,000 votes.

Speaker 10:
[09:05] We could have seen this coming.

Speaker 7:
[09:06] No way.

Speaker 4:
[09:07] Oh, my God.

Speaker 7:
[09:08] That's why?

Speaker 1:
[09:09] I asked research. Apparently, a research of black books.

Speaker 3:
[09:12] Hey, you catch it from a crush fight, did you?

Speaker 1:
[09:16] Yeah, went down from 50,000 volts to 1,000 volts. Go check the references. We provide them every day.

Speaker 5:
[09:21] We still don't have it.

Speaker 1:
[09:22] That's not going to be all of them, is it? That's not going to be all of the references, is it?

Speaker 5:
[09:26] I hope not.

Speaker 1:
[09:27] All right, okay. Wonderful. I don't know, at a certain point, don't you think police should serve the role of police officers?

Speaker 6:
[09:34] Yeah.

Speaker 1:
[09:34] How do you maintain the peace if you don't have a device that neutralizes violent threats?

Speaker 6:
[09:40] They don't even have guns, do they?

Speaker 1:
[09:41] No, they don't have guns.

Speaker 9:
[09:42] That's the best thing they have.

Speaker 1:
[09:43] Well, that's what they want. Again, what does the left want? What would they do if completely unfettered? You can see that with the police force, obviously in the UK. And by the way, this is the same police force that will arrest people for showing up to support Tommy Robinson or protest their government and they will arrest people for... They'll try.

Speaker 4:
[09:57] I mean, unless you work out.

Speaker 1:
[09:59] Yeah. For flying... Yeah, it's just you have to...

Speaker 4:
[10:01] I'm toast, but they're not going to get Gerald Morgan over there.

Speaker 1:
[10:04] The left... What do they want? They want cops to not have guns. No chokeholds. And they want tasers. And they say tasers are cruel. So now you have what you want in the UK. Can you imagine if that was a black guy?

Speaker 4:
[10:15] They would have never got him on the ground in the first place.

Speaker 1:
[10:16] No.

Speaker 4:
[10:17] Could have been an immigrant.

Speaker 1:
[10:18] One of the last times I went from the UK was in the top 10 as far as a hundred meter dash. The answer is none.

Speaker 4:
[10:23] I can't even hurtle those little tiny fences they have there.

Speaker 1:
[10:26] Yeah, that's a front yard. I don't understand it.

Speaker 4:
[10:29] Is it just for decoration?

Speaker 11:
[10:30] This is my side.

Speaker 4:
[10:31] That's your side.

Speaker 1:
[10:32] Come over if you like.

Speaker 4:
[10:33] It's easy.

Speaker 3:
[10:34] Tiny fences make prite neighbors.

Speaker 12:
[10:39] Why not just use wood?

Speaker 3:
[10:41] I don't know. So much brick.

Speaker 1:
[10:42] Everything makes no sense. And I know you think that was bad, but at least they are better than the Chinese police.

Speaker 4:
[10:54] Yikes. Oh, no.

Speaker 1:
[10:57] They brought it down from 500 CCs to 100 CCs.

Speaker 3:
[11:01] Still hurts, isn't it?

Speaker 1:
[11:03] To be fair, it is also better than some American cops. We don't get everything perfectly. We have some who are going through an epidemic of Alzheimer's.

Speaker 3:
[11:25] You never told me your name.

Speaker 10:
[11:27] It's the first I'm seeing of you.

Speaker 3:
[11:29] I'd say it if I knew. Is it Jamal? Just in case. Right, is he gonna hit me harder?

Speaker 13:
[11:36] No, Mohamed.

Speaker 8:
[11:37] Is it, is it Tyrone?

Speaker 3:
[11:41] Is your name John?

Speaker 6:
[11:42] It's the UK guys, come on.

Speaker 3:
[11:44] Are you a ghost of Negroes here to come? They do usually enter your home at 3 a.m. That's what happens to the color to enter when the bell toves one.

Speaker 4:
[11:58] Oh, it's one, that's right. I got my Dickens wrong.

Speaker 1:
[12:03] Molly was not going to begin with. I'm sorry, guys, this is one of those days because are the overlays gonna be working now?

Speaker 14:
[12:11] We're working on it.

Speaker 1:
[12:12] We're working on it.

Speaker 14:
[12:13] Well, really? There's some bugs in the TriCaster today.

Speaker 1:
[12:15] There's some bugs in the TriCaster.

Speaker 14:
[12:16] Here comes the eye.

Speaker 3:
[12:17] It's just one of those days.

Speaker 1:
[12:19] We just went from the most English sounding people to the most douchey Americans. Most of all time.

Speaker 14:
[12:25] That's fine, though.

Speaker 3:
[12:26] TriCaster not working, bulls.

Speaker 1:
[12:28] Well, you guys let me know when that is working. Of course, we'll provide all the references as we do every show. 11 a.m. Eastern, we live stream and you'll be able to look them up. I don't know, it's just a blank box coming up. It's a barren box. We did it, box, we did the work. Just like the wounds of many and call her daddy, which we'll get to, see? I tie it all together.

Speaker 6:
[12:47] Nice.

Speaker 1:
[12:48] No one does it like I do. All right, Miss Rachel, the worst.

Speaker 6:
[12:58] Gross.

Speaker 1:
[12:58] Yeah, and we're gonna be talking about like the SPLC, we're gonna be talking about like actual Klansmen, actual Neo Nazis a little later on. I still think Miss Rachel is the worst. She's the pits, let's put it that way. So let me give you a spoiler alert here. Everything you are about to hear from Miss Rachel is complete bullcrap, okay? She made some claims about ICE and children in detention facilities, and of course she went on MSNOW, formerly MSNBC. We're going to fact check it, but I also just want to take this moment, if you are a parent and you are having your children watch Miss Rachel still, because, oh, they like it and she's nice. They are one click away from celebrating binding their breasts. You understand that. We did a whole segment on Miss Rachel. You are being a bad parent if you don't want them to become an angry feminist leftist. Just to be clear, here she is, MSNBC, flat out lying.

Speaker 15:
[13:51] You have spent so, so much time dedicated to speaking to seven different families inside of Dilley and trying to just understand the conditions that they've been subjected to there. I want to know what you've learned from them, what you've learned from all of these kids.

Speaker 16:
[14:08] It's heartbreaking talking to the kids and their families. They're talking about water that they can't even drink, that makes them sick. There's been worms in the food, the food's rotten sometimes. And what really frightens me is the dangerously inadequate medical care and medical emergencies. These are basic human rights for children and we can all agree not to harm and abuse children. It's not who we want to be and I'm kind of in shock about what I'm hearing. And I don't think people really know what's going on inside of Dilley. And I think if we all know, I really think we can unite over not wanting to harm children.

Speaker 1:
[14:51] This is the trick that the left pulls. I think we can all agree that we don't want to harm or abuse children. Of course. Absolutely. We had Tom Homan on the show and he talked about children who he found buried alive, children who were fried in the back of shipping containers because they were locked in by drug cartels. We all agree with that. And then she parlay's that into a lie. They're telling me that, okay, key fact number one here. It's all hearsay. Ms. Rachel never visited Dilley whatsoever. Just to be clear. So there's no real way to even fact check what she's saying because she simply claims I spoke with the families, which may or may not be true. And the children are saying, the children may or may not be saying that if she even spoke with them. However, we can actually examine the statistics, the data, the history of the facilities and tell you that it is verifiably untrue. We don't need to go into anything else. She didn't go. She's never been there. The media is acting as though she has visited. She has not. Just like AOC wasn't handcuffed. She did, however, Ms. Rachel, post a video for all the kids in question. See, she shouldn't train AI on her. That seems like it's missing the tone.

Speaker 4:
[16:11] And of course, of course, that's what these families are saying.

Speaker 3:
[16:14] Yeah.

Speaker 4:
[16:14] They don't want to be there. They want to, they want to, you know, they want to tell people that they're being mistreated so they can come back and not have to be deported.

Speaker 3:
[16:23] Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 1:
[16:24] This whole thing, we'll get you, get some clips. This whole thing has been orchestrated from the ground up, just to be clear. It wasn't an accident, it wasn't happenstance. When you look at Eagle Pass, we'll get to that. So she did not go. She chatted with some families, allegedly, started a petition to close Dilley. It's been signed thus far by about 250,000 people who also have never been there. Now, here's the thing, before we go on, you do need to remember this key bit of information. If illegal aliens don't like the conditions, they are free to self-deport. Yeah. Now, they won't get the check, the $2,600 plus all expenses paid, because they forwent that on the CBP One app. They can do that right now. If you get caught, you are sent to death. They can still leave. They can still leave to the equal culture of Mexico. They can just raise their hand and say, I'm ready to go back home, wherever that is. Yep. And they can leave immediately and not have bad food and bad medical care, supposedly. Right. Well, that brings us to key fact number two, because she allegedly spoke with them and they were allegedly telling her this. No way to really fact check it, except for the fact that she didn't actually go. But we can show you documented proof as to what Dillie is actually like. Here's a montage. And of course, there's limited access. So some of these are older clips, some are newer.

Speaker 8:
[17:41] KSAT-12 was given a rare look inside the 55-acre facility. We visited the medical area, classrooms, housing and cafeteria. It cost $156 million annually to operate this facility.

Speaker 1:
[18:20] So she tells you the water. I guess, what is this, like a porta potty water? Non-potable. You'd have to find a district, a county, for that to be the case outside of Flint. And she tells it there are worms in the food. There may or may not be, for example, a fruit fly every now and then. We have that here in the office fridge, to be clear.

Speaker 4:
[18:40] I got that from Cava.

Speaker 1:
[18:41] Yeah. That's a play.

Speaker 4:
[18:44] It's Mediterranean.

Speaker 1:
[18:44] Cava is also that new street drug that people take, but it's a natural root or herb, something from the Samoans.

Speaker 4:
[18:48] I don't know.

Speaker 1:
[18:49] But Dilley, what do they have? Classrooms, libraries, medical facilities, gyms, recreational areas, cafeterias, apples, laundry room, salons, barber shops. And I know that this is completely untrue because I've spent time with ICE agents. And I will tell you, not only are they on their best behavior because they understand the optics war, and that no matter what they do, they will be accused of committing heinous acts, but these people also care. And many of them are Hispanic. Many of them come from families of immigrants. They have a job to do, and they go out of their way to do it incredibly humanely. Experience it firsthand.

Speaker 7:
[19:29] You can't tell him where we are.

Speaker 17:
[19:30] When we put the handcuffs on, apparently one of them went a little bit, not necessarily the best way, so he complained, and we made sure that we readjusted him, which speaks about the humanitarian factor. A lot of times people say the ICE agents are, you know, they're all about putting them in handcuffs.

Speaker 1:
[19:45] No.

Speaker 17:
[19:46] Look, I'm gonna tell them that you tell them later, you're gonna have a chance to make a phone call. Right. We're gonna take care of you, just relax, calm down. Don't do anything crazy. Just follow the orders that we give you.

Speaker 1:
[19:56] And a key fact here at number three that you need to keep in mind, the kids in cages, that's an Obama era thing. It actually goes back to the floor's consent policy, I believe under Clinton, and then they've kind of reversed it, reversed it, reversed it, but he's the reason that kids are in cages. Remember that famous, who built the cages, Joe, at the debate? Yeah. Because they keep trying to change the policy, not based on what's best for the country, not even what's best for the kids, but for optics. And so, this is the problem. This lady is teaching your kids, and she has already decided that feelings matter more than reality. That so long as it yields the results she wants, right? In helping who she views as the oppressed, because she's a Marxist. She is a Marxist, therefore parents who come here illegally and choose to not do the right thing, so their children are separated, well, they're the oppressed. So they need to be helped. However, she gets you to believe her narrative, truthful or not, is justified. That is the worldview of the Marxist, and that is how she will teach your children. You need any more proof as to, well, my hunch, because I can't fully fact check it, why this is bullcrap. Every single narrative we have been given regarding ICE and regarding deportations has been false. Remember Abrego Garcia, Maryland man, well, he was an MS-13 human trafficker. Remember Mahmoud Khalil, well, actually a pro-Hamas activist who was harassing students. Remember Liam Ramos, right? They arrested a five-year-old ICE. Well, actually, it turns out it was a father who abandoned the kids and they actually were trying to have the child be taken by a mom or a family member, and they stayed there to protect the child. You can point me to any example, any example, guess what? It was a lie. Guarantee you this one is as well. Also, Ms. Rachel seems to have exclusively fundraised for people outside of the United States. She doesn't seem to care that much about Americans. Gaza, Congo, Ukraine, Sudan, she's done work on behalf of an NGO like Save the Children, which just has the most generic name humanly possible. It's something I would make up for a parody. This is why they're actually mad, the left, to be clear. They don't actually believe that ICE is abusing children. They don't actually believe that they're eating worm, riddled food and drinking toxic arsenic water. They don't actually believe any of those things. I'll tell you this, the left doesn't even believe that it's cruel to give an illegal alien $2,600 in all expenses paid trip back to their home country with the opportunity to come back the right way. The real reason that the left is furious is because they were on track to steal this country from you, the American people, with a record number of bought and paid for votes. Need more proof? Check out this video of Eagle Pass. Remember Eagle Pass was really a center point of the conversation? It's now pretty much empty, no traffic.

Speaker 18:
[22:55] This is the US Mexico border near Eagle Pass, Texas. You can see Mexico just a few yards away across the Rio Grande. And this is what it looked like in December of 2023 under the Biden administration. Behind me is a makeshift staging ground where hundreds of migrants from Latin America have been sleeping and waiting to be processed by overtaxed border patrol agents here in Eagle Pass, Texas. During this entire trip, we have not seen a single migrant. And the fire chief of Eagle Pass told us that during the Biden administration at the peak of the border crisis, his team was responding to about three reports of migrants drowning every single day. Now they're responding to one drowning every three months. So the situation here has changed dramatically.

Speaker 1:
[23:38] Remember how we told you this a very long time ago? We said, hey, the fake victim class creates actual victims. The fake victim class creates real victims. That's what we see with illegal immigration. Oh, they're just coming here seeking a better life, they say about every single person who comes here, works seasonally, sends money back, and then leaves and doesn't pay taxes. Now, what really happens is you're creating a class of actual victims, you know, more slaves than ever on earth in recorded history right now, 50 million, a lot of them just trafficked sexually, that takes place across the border. Three people per day drown versus one every three months. Those are some of the real victims. Tom Holman was on the show, we talked about that. Even the people who are actually doing or think they're doing right by their family, coming here to work in a hotel, coming here to work construction, guess what? It enables the entire industry of drug cartels and people die. People are trafficked across the border. That was directly the result of Marxist leftist compassion, to be clear. How many kids were missing? 300 and something thousand kids, I think was the number that was being floated around during that time period. How many of those three per day crossing that river do you think were kids that were drowning? The most vulnerable people trying to get across that river. Adults could probably swim to some degree, but the children that they were trying to carry at the same time, probably not. People like Miss Rachel pissed me off in this conversation because they stopped to think of the next thing. They just go, oh, somebody told me something, so therefore this must be bad. You want to put kids with parents? That's fantastic.

Speaker 19:
[25:08] What if they're not their parents?

Speaker 1:
[25:09] What if you just put kids with their traffickers that are abusing them? One of the big reasons, Holman told us, that these people are separated. You want to save kids' lives? Make sure there's no incentive to come across the border illegally because they die in the back of trailers and beg their father not to let anybody hurt them or eat them. I can't remember what the little boy said before they died. That's what Holman said happened. What happened with that one is it was the back of a, not like a shipping container, but you know where they would carry horses, livestock? And there was a small window. And at this point, they were cooking alive in there because they were left by the Coyotes Cartel. And some of the people, because someone had survived, he said that some of the people thought, if we throw some body parts out of that window, people may come and check on us. We may be able to get people's attention. And of course, the only body parts that would fit through the window would be that young boy. And so they found the young boy draped by his father protecting him. And Tom Homan was crying on this show talking about it. I mean, to suggest that he doesn't care. You know what, how about this? Instead of going to the whole who cares more, and it's very obvious the left is incredibly caring when it comes to dealing with other people's money, how about we approach policy with, all right, what's the benefit for the United States? Let's do that. It used to be with illegal aliens, they would say, who's gonna pick your strawberries? Who's gonna clean your toilets, right? Because they were racist. Well, now with AI and automation, that's not really a thing, and plenty of Americans are willing to go into trades and work these jobs. So, what's the benefit? It's very clear it wasn't by accident. Can we all agree with that? Now, it's very clear that it wasn't by accident. Okay, the border was kind of porous, and we tightened it up a little bit. They were proactively, deliberately allowing people to come over and basically telling them, yeah, you're on your way, appear at your court date or not. What's the benefit to people coming here from the United States who don't speak the language, who aren't skilled in any particular form of labor or educated and get plenty of subsidies and access to social services? What's the benefit? We should approach everything with that. That's what America first made. And that does include foreign policy as well. There can be benefit. Do it if it's beneficial to the American people. You know, what countries have done since the history of always? And what all other countries still do. Do you think that those not paying their bill in NATO? Or do you think they're doing that for any reason other than it is to their benefit? Do you think that other nations who don't fund their own military because they know the United States will protect them, or they can give their people all kinds of luxuries and frivolities? Do you think they're doing that because it's to anything other than their benefit? Do you think other nations do anything to their detriment? The one exception is if it's part of a globalist or internationalist order where it's temporarily to their detriment as far as mass migration, but it is beneficial to those in power. The left is in elite positions. We should approach everything with, what's the benefit here? What do we get out of it? Some people may say that's cold, but you know what? I think it's cold to enact a policy that leads to three people drowning that could be completely avoided every single day as we saw at Eagle's Pass. How about that? Eagle Pass. I always have a problem with the apostrophe S. Here's one thing though, I will say, there is a benefit to the illegal aliens themselves. For example, deported illegal aliens, they don't have to worry about the mortgage.

Speaker 6:
[28:26] Not anymore.

Speaker 1:
[28:27] That's a pain in the ass, but you do.

Speaker 6:
[28:29] Oh.

Speaker 1:
[28:29] So take the help where you can get it. And here we are at the bottom of the seventh. What a game it has been thus far.

Speaker 3:
[28:38] The bases are loaded, folks.

Speaker 4:
[28:40] I got loaded last night after the bank called me.

Speaker 1:
[28:43] Up to bat now is Babe Ruth. Wait, that's not a woman, is it?

Speaker 4:
[28:48] No, no, it was a man who called me. A woman at the bank?

Speaker 1:
[28:51] Are you a ludicrous?

Speaker 3:
[28:52] No, you imbecile, the player, Babe. It's saying right here it's a man.

Speaker 1:
[28:56] Babe Ruth is in fact a man.

Speaker 4:
[28:58] Oh, they said due to the market crash, they're repossessing the house.

Speaker 1:
[29:01] There's the windup, the pitch, and oh, doctor, it appears he hit the ball over the wall. That has got to be illegal.

Speaker 4:
[29:10] That's what I said, but I guess all my stocks are worthless now, and I'm dead broke.

Speaker 1:
[29:14] No, not you, you imbecile.

Speaker 10:
[29:17] I meant that towering hit over the wall.

Speaker 1:
[29:19] We have to check the room book here and see if we'll get back to you folks. That's never been done before. He'll likely get kicked out of the game for that kind of measure.

Speaker 4:
[29:26] Just like I got kicked out of my home.

Speaker 1:
[29:28] Will you stop making this about you? Chip, you're pathetic life. You're making everyone sad. What's this now? They're talking. Hold on. Yes, I'm getting word the umpires have talked it over. They're saying that that is, in fact, a legal hit. Over the walls, a legal hit, the batter and all three runners will score.

Speaker 4:
[29:50] Wow.

Speaker 10:
[29:51] Everyone's scoring but me these days.

Speaker 3:
[29:53] They're calling it a home run.

Speaker 4:
[29:55] After this game, I won't have a home to run to.

Speaker 1:
[29:57] Well, you wouldn't be in this situation, Chip, if you'd have called American Financing like I've told you. They've helped thousands of Americans. They never charge any upfront or hidden fees, so you don't have to worry about any curve balls, and you need to make better decisions overall, Chip.

Speaker 4:
[30:11] That doesn't sound half bad.

Speaker 1:
[30:13] And for you, half bad's the best you're going to get.

Speaker 13:
[30:15] Here's the pitch, and...

Speaker 7:
[30:18] Foul ball!

Speaker 1:
[30:24] Walk it off, Chip. We have a job to do. I really have saved a lot of people a lot of money, and they keep running these, and... These are the least offensive at the end of the day. We need to get more offensive and just see what we can do with this. Let's see where the line really is. We did one time, and they were like, really, they were okay with it? I mean... It was like, that was my favorite one.

Speaker 4:
[31:00] Yeah.

Speaker 1:
[31:00] That's weird.

Speaker 4:
[31:01] All right, gotta take a note here. More offensive.

Speaker 1:
[31:05] Got it, done. Cool. We did American History X, I mean...

Speaker 4:
[31:08] I can do more offensive.

Speaker 1:
[31:09] Yeah, we can do American Psycho.

Speaker 4:
[31:11] Yeah, we could definitely do American Psycho.

Speaker 1:
[31:13] Yeah, absolutely. Okay, this is one that I am particularly excited about. And I've seen some people reacting to this going, oh, this is more Kabuki theater. These are not the arrests that we want. The Southern Poverty Law Center. They've now been indicted by, I believe he talks about Grand Jury. Let me ask you before we get into this, how familiar are you with the Southern Poverty Law Center? How familiar are you with the significance of the Southern Poverty Law Center? To give you an idea, the SPLC, they were an apparatus that were probably the single most, I should say, weaponized tool for social media platforms in censorship. So YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, they all used SPLC with their opaque, they would have community guidelines, advertiser-friendly guidelines, borderline content guidelines. The SPLC was usually the authority in the room according to these platforms as it related to dealing with hate speech, labeling something hate speech, labeling something a hate group, which included non-denominational Christian churches. But not only them, they also had relationships with companies, Google, Amazon, MasterCard, Visa, Paypal, Salesforce. And of course, yours truly, we were at one point deplatformed from all of that. And the SPLC had specifically targeted this show by name in multiple instances. They've done it with pretty much every notable conservative, either individual or organization. They have been so subversive, so pervasive, they have had their hands in everything for a long time. This is a very significant scalp. So what would happen from SPLC if you would actually follow them a while ago? What you saw as far as the front, the public facing sort of window dressing, they would have headlines like this, President Trump is stoking white nationalism, exploiting racist fear, Homeland Security deploys white nationalists, anti-immigrant graphics to recruit. The racist great replacement conspiracy theory explained. It turns out the SPLC, the reason they are being indicted, because they were paying leaders of these groups that you could argue wouldn't exist if not for the Southern Poverty Law Center. It was completely astroturfed. It seems like they have been trying to, and have been effectively doing this, making white people out to be the boogeyman for over a decade.

Speaker 20:
[33:52] This next stage is even more exciting because of who will be at the helm.

Speaker 1:
[34:00] It's always worse than the last. So DOJ announced the charges yesterday against the Southern Poverty Law Center. This is the end of an era, and it was an era that many people didn't even know was happening right under their noses.

Speaker 5:
[34:15] Today, a few minutes ago, in the Middle District of Alabama, a grand jury returned an 11-count indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center with six counts of wire fraud, four counts of bank fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. The SPLC was paying a member of the leadership group that planned the Unite the Right protest in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017 that resulted in the death of one person and injured dozens more. This particular person being paid by the SPLC allegedly received approximately $270,000 over the course of eight years. In total, according to the indictment, between 2014 and 2023, SPLC paid at least $3 million to eight individuals at least. These individuals were affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, United Clans of America, National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, the National Socialist Party of America, Nazis, and the American Front.

Speaker 1:
[35:32] Now, let me ask you this. Have you ever met a member of the Klan? Do you know any actual neo-Nazis? I don't mean do you acknowledge crime statistics. I don't mean do you like to have strong borders. I don't mean do you acknowledge racial differences. I mean, have you ever actually known someone who is a part of a hate group?

Speaker 4:
[35:53] No, but at one time at a bar, I did see a motorcycle guy and he had an SPLC patch on his vest.

Speaker 3:
[35:58] Did he? Yeah.

Speaker 4:
[36:00] I was like, is that a sponsorship patch?

Speaker 1:
[36:01] What is that? Hopefully a three-piece rocker and he got his ass kicked.

Speaker 3:
[36:04] Don't wear it if you don't live it.

Speaker 4:
[36:06] Bunch of anarchy in the back.

Speaker 1:
[36:09] So because the SPLC wants you to believe that they're around every corner, and they would like them to be around every corner, that's why they were funding it. So the SPLC, according to their own website, references available 11 AM every day, bibliography, every show. The SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. And the way they did that is by censoring mainstream right-leaning conservative voices, pressuring big tech, working in tandem, by the way, with the Biden and Obama administration. They referenced the SPLC ad nauseam, destroying lives while paying the leadership of said racial supremacist groups. This is why when we made ourselves cancel proof, and that's because of your membership, MugClub, it's now Rumble Premium. We saw the writing on the wall early on. We didn't want to be reliant on sponsors. We knew that YouTube was going to try and pinch that valve. They demonetized us. We saw it coming. But when we were starting our awareness campaign, going back to 2015, we constantly used the SPLC as a reference point, because that is who all of the big tech companies would cite. Make no mistake, this is a giant that has fallen. The Southern Poverty Law Center today only serves as a propaganda wing of the left. People need to understand that. In 1986, the entire staff outside of the founder left the SPLC. And most of them said it was because the organization was shifting from fighting against death penalty, from fighting for social justice sort of landmark cases to simply targeting conservatives and creating their right wing hate watch.

Speaker 21:
[37:54] I just want you to see their faces. Look at them. The members of the SPLC. They have helped thousands of victims of the words of MugClub.

Speaker 1:
[38:04] We do need to band together and understand the size of the enemy that we're facing right now. And the SPLC is a huge one.

Speaker 21:
[38:11] Because...

Speaker 14:
[38:17] The Tijeras had classified 900 organizations as hate groups, the best opportunity to knock down MugClub as one.

Speaker 1:
[38:28] By the way, these are the same people, the SPLC, who determines what content is hate speech, what content is allowed.

Speaker 10:
[38:32] We're gonna grab the SPLC by the dick, and we're gonna kick them in the ass!

Speaker 1:
[38:37] The SPLC is one of the main, I guess you would say, one of the main seats on this board of directors that YouTube has in determining content guidelines. With MugClub growing into the largest pay service subscription model on the internet, not only did Blacko Mugskebar find himself on Big Tex Radar, but straight in the crosshairs of the SPLC. See, the SPLC are arbiters of what's determined hate speech and allowed on the platforms, and they decided that Blacko had to go. And this may be why when people say they're all the same, I just don't agree. I have been around for a long time and we have had to deal with lawyers in the SPLC and conversations with Google executives, YouTube executives who would cite the SPLC. This is a big deal. They are not all the same because the left enables references, directs people to and supports the SPLC. I have not been thrilled with Cash Patel's job performance. I have not been thrilled with this DOJ in a lot of ways. This is a big win and it's a bigger win than most people realize because the SPLC has been pretty effective in really affecting change without you knowing about it. Unless someone has plugged in, they don't know. Wait a second. Why were people banned for questioning the election on? Oh, that's right. The SPLC was on that board. But wait a second. Why were these people deplatformed? Oh, that's right. The SPLC was on that board. Wait a second. Why were churches named as hate groups and pastors being prosecuted? Oh, that's right. The SPLC was on that board. 2024, they received $106 million in donations. Now, they claimed that those donations were going to, quote, dismantle white supremacy. Turns out they were actually funding it. There's one way to dismantle it. Yeah. Turns out they were actually paying for it. The reason that any white supremacy is still alive can most likely, in other words, pick a white supremacist, pick someone who seems radical, a racial extremist. Yes, SPLC. They likely have been supported by the SPLC in some capacity, either their organization, they've been amplified, and they may not even know it. Here's how they did it. The SPLC would first set up bank accounts with names like the Center Investigative Agency, CIA, Fox Photography, Northwest Technologies, Tech Writers Group, Rare Books Warehouse. Then they would use those accounts to funnel money to their quote unquote informants. And I'm also curious to see, you don't just indict people because of informants. These people were actually engaged in crimes. According to the DOJ indictment, the SPLC's paid informants, their field sources, engaged in the active promotion of racist groups at the same time that the SPLC was denouncing those same groups on their website. Which groups? Check the references, the KKK, the National Socialist Party, the National Alliance, Unite the Right. Yeah, Unite the Right in Charlottesville. That was emblematic. Remember that? Yeah. That's where the Donald Trump quote will play that for you. That they misrepresented, they straight up lied about, try to impeach him over. That was largely supported and funded by the SPLC. And the acting AG right now, Todd Blanch, he was very straightforward when talking about it.

Speaker 6:
[41:56] I just want to make sure I understand you're alleging that the Southern Poverty Law Center was paying the leaders of KKK and other groups to continue their operations. Is that?

Speaker 5:
[42:08] I'm not alleging it. The grand jury returned an indictment that says that.

Speaker 1:
[42:12] Well, that seems pretty cut and dry. Oh, Nadek, what's going on?

Speaker 5:
[42:17] I don't know. I have all sorts of issues with this trial. I don't know what's wrong with the trial yesterday. Something is.

Speaker 1:
[42:22] Are we good now?

Speaker 5:
[42:23] I think so.

Speaker 1:
[42:24] OK, well, that was mildly annoying. Yeah, uh, Applejack, it's not even, that's just mildly annoying as a prank.

Speaker 3:
[42:42] Can you see you soon?

Speaker 1:
[42:49] OK, I never had that universal phantom income.

Speaker 4:
[42:52] You see him swing in?

Speaker 1:
[42:53] I didn't see him swing in. I saw him swing out. Why are ceilings so high?

Speaker 6:
[42:59] It's for acoustics and acoustics.

Speaker 4:
[43:01] Yeah, it's mostly for acoustics.

Speaker 3:
[43:03] I don't know.

Speaker 1:
[43:03] I think we need a whole we need a whole remodel.

Speaker 5:
[43:07] Give the guy a new parking spot and he takes over the studio.

Speaker 3:
[43:09] Yeah, I know.

Speaker 4:
[43:10] Geez, man.

Speaker 1:
[43:11] Stupid mask. Give him a mouse a cookie. You know, loses a little bit of weight and gets a whole new war. Yeah, nothing's good enough for him.

Speaker 4:
[43:17] He's like, I can finally fit into my cape.

Speaker 1:
[43:18] Yes, that's why he's been doing it, really. So Charlottesville, if you guys have forgotten, Charlottesville is what the left, but they go, see, we have plenty of racists in this country. And see Donald Trump's voting base, the deplorables, they are racist because you saw what happened in Charlottesville. Again, keep in mind, funded by the SPLC here.

Speaker 22:
[43:36] It was a weekend of street battles and stark displays of racism exploding into a deadly act of domestic terror. Tonight, we examine the hateful groups that now appear to be banding together. Why are they now emerging from the shadows, emboldened and growing in numbers?

Speaker 23:
[43:51] Hate no longer hides behind hoods. This was the scene in the liberal college town of Charlottesville, Virginia on Friday, reminiscent of images from a dark American path.

Speaker 18:
[44:06] So this is a racist rally, and we should name it as such. I'm less interested, actually, in the rally, I'm more interested in how this rally functions.

Speaker 12:
[44:13] I could see from my office here in New York City how this was building. This was not just a predictable book.

Speaker 1:
[44:18] They all look so weird, disgenic.

Speaker 20:
[44:20] The most striking thing is how well organized it was.

Speaker 1:
[44:22] That's exactly how I think of Vice News Report of the Book.

Speaker 22:
[44:23] There was people doing crowd control. There were people dropping people off at specific locations.

Speaker 13:
[44:28] Oh, that's the lady who tried to grill Tim Dillon.

Speaker 23:
[44:29] There were people handing out extra tiki torches.

Speaker 9:
[44:31] Everyone who was there knew exactly what they were signing up for.

Speaker 13:
[44:34] I'm joined now by Mark Potuck of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Speaker 24:
[44:38] I think that this is a new generation of racists who, as Carol and Leonard both have suggested, were in large part created by Donald Trump and others like Donald Trump.

Speaker 1:
[44:51] Well, the funny thing is they were actually created by you, Mr. Upside Down Face. Doesn't he look like Upside Down Face?

Speaker 4:
[44:58] Yeah, I was going to say a weird bird, but yeah.

Speaker 1:
[45:02] His face isn't Upside Down.

Speaker 24:
[45:04] Oh, my gosh.

Speaker 1:
[45:05] This brings us to Informant F37, a new generation of racists created by Donald Trump. The problem is they couldn't find racists created by Donald Trump, so they made their own. In the indictment, F37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 Unite the Right event in Charlottesville, Virginia, and attended the event at the direction of the SPLC. F37 made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC.

Speaker 10:
[45:36] Make it more racist, more racist.

Speaker 1:
[45:37] Come on, drop an n-bomb or two.

Speaker 15:
[45:39] Yeah, yeah, it would be better.

Speaker 1:
[45:40] And helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees. Between 2015 and 2023, the SPLC secretly paid F37 more than $270,000.

Speaker 3:
[45:54] What?

Speaker 4:
[45:55] I heard racism doesn't pay.

Speaker 3:
[45:56] Yeah.

Speaker 4:
[45:57] That's what I heard. It's cool.

Speaker 3:
[45:59] It's not the racist Charlottesville needs.

Speaker 24:
[46:04] I am F37.

Speaker 1:
[46:07] I swear to the SPLC, swear to me.

Speaker 24:
[46:11] Racist night.

Speaker 4:
[46:11] There's racist there.

Speaker 24:
[46:12] Where are they?

Speaker 1:
[46:14] Charlottesville. It was the defining media moment. The left kept trying to say racist, racist, racist, and then they found more black people voting for Donald Trump, and they found more Hispanic people voting for Donald Trump, and they found a bunch of people who voted for Barack Obama voting for Donald Trump, and they found more young people voting for Donald Trump who tend to be anti-racist. But we need to have, we've been saying they're racist all this time, so they fabricated one. People use the term Psyop all the time now. They'll say Psyop to really attack anyone who says something they don't agree with. This is an actual example of that, and it's been spanning across a decade. Charlottesville, the defining moment of President Trump's first term, even though he had nothing to do with it, and he condemned very clearly the actions of those involved, and that tells you they had a preset narrative, because they just decided to act as though he praised those SPLC-funded racists. Anyway, they ran with this for years.

Speaker 19:
[47:16] President Trump causing shock and alarm tonight among Americans blaming both sides for the violence in Charlottesville.

Speaker 24:
[47:22] The president continues to believe against all the evidence that there were very fine people on both sides at the alt-right neo-Nazi white supremacists Unite the Right rally that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia two summers ago.

Speaker 7:
[47:34] Donald Trump said and I quote, there are very fine people on both sides. My God. That's what he said.

Speaker 9:
[47:42] Let's remember Charlottesville, where there was a mob of people carrying tiki torches, spewing anti-Semitic hate. And what did the president then at the time say? There were fine people on each side.

Speaker 11:
[47:59] But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You're changing history, you're changing culture, and you had people, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?

Speaker 6:
[48:21] I would have been one of those people.

Speaker 1:
[48:23] Right. Protesting, taking down statues.

Speaker 6:
[48:27] That's it.

Speaker 1:
[48:28] That is...

Speaker 4:
[48:29] You do have a garage full of Tiki Dorges.

Speaker 1:
[48:31] He does. He likes his Lua's. That is as measured and honestly as thoughtful of an answer as can be provided at that kind of a melting point or boiling point. Donald Trump gave it. They already had their marching orders before that. We are going to say that Donald Trump is supporting these people because they are his voting base. They went out of their way. And then there was a wrinkle. I'm not saying new Nazis, white supremacists who should be condemned totally. What do we do? Let's just act like he didn't say that. And you still have people who believe it. That's the SPLC. I always say with conspiracy theories, your litmus test is how many people have to be involved? How many people have to keep quiet? Like Area 51, it's pretty hard to get the janitor in on it. With the SPLC, they've already told you. It's really clear. SPLC, they were on the boards for moderation content guidelines, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter back then. So Meta, that includes Instagram as well. They had relationships with Amazon, Apple, MasterCard, Visa, Shopify, PayPal, go through all. There's a connection. All of them. It's not different connections. It's all of these companies going right back to the SPLC. Okay, draw those as a line, then one line out from SPLC, paying every single notable racial supremacist group.

Speaker 4:
[50:00] Do you think the SPLC was sitting in a room watching that press conference, like the NASA people at Houston when they watched a capsule come through the atmosphere?

Speaker 10:
[50:09] He said it!

Speaker 1:
[50:11] He said fine people. You just saw the part where he said not neo-Nazis. Well, we'll just continue. Do you think that Kamala Harris doesn't know? By the way, she's quoted the SPLC. She's talked about their great work. So is Barack Obama. So is Joe Biden. And they all have, it's not just that they all have the same talking points. That happens when you share perspectives. It's that they all have the same wrong facts. How does that happen? How does the entire DNC miss that Donald Trump specifically said, I'm not saying neo-Nazis, white supremacists, about an event that was funded by the SPLC? How do all of them get it wrong the exact same way? And then how did all of the media, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, or MSNOW, New York Times, how did they all get it wrong? And how did none of them correct it? Because there was plenty of information online where people were going like, well, hold on a second, you actually condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis. All of them? It's not a conspiracy if you see it taking place right before your very eyes. And now we have receipts. Now we have a paper trail. Anyone saying that this is not significant doesn't know how evil, and I mean truly evil, the SPLC is. Yeah, a lot of people have had concerns that whatever the Trump administration does could be undone by the next administration. We've heard that over and over, especially on the border. Not this. Right? That taking out NGOs makes it incredibly hard for these organizations. You're going after the root causes of a lot of these problems that we've had in this country. And when you take out something like the SPLC, which most people, if they heard of the SPLC, they probably heard of them in a very positive light, right? This is an organization you can trust. They've got great information.

Speaker 20:
[52:01] They're doing great work.

Speaker 1:
[52:02] This undercuts that. And hopefully these institutions will now come into question for everyone and say, I don't want any part of that because these guys are just lying and funding it on the other side.

Speaker 20:
[52:11] Are you kidding me?

Speaker 1:
[52:12] It was a huge deal when people found out that Bibi Netanyahu was actually funding Hamas to play them against the PLO. How about this? This organization is funding the very people they're supposed to be fighting. I want to see the same outrage. Yeah.

Speaker 2:
[52:26] I want to see the very same outrage.

Speaker 4:
[52:28] I hope so. The media is definitely spinning it the way they're writing their headlines right now.

Speaker 1:
[52:32] They're trying to say, oh, prosecute it. They're going after political opponents.

Speaker 4:
[52:35] There's that. There's also the way CNN framed it for paying informants to get to the bottom of racism. And then there's another one that's like they're being indicted for paying informants to go with these hate groups, which is exactly what the FBI and CIA do. It's like, well, yeah, they're government agencies. Yeah, well, also by the way, they were taking donor money and then lying about how they were spending it.

Speaker 1:
[52:58] Yeah.

Speaker 4:
[52:59] And then secretly spending it and laundering it.

Speaker 1:
[53:01] And also the FBI, those organizations have been borderline, I would say entrapment, the Governor Whitmer plot. SPLC, if they were a government, an official government, it would absolutely be entrapment. And you'd have people who would be tried for. This absolutely would be entrapment. No, paying over the course of five, six years, paying for supplies and helping to galvanize people who otherwise might not even be involved. And here's the other thing, there weren't that many people involved. SPLC would also, I guarantee you, you think those photographers didn't know who took a picture of 12 people and reported to the media that it was 1200?

Speaker 4:
[53:35] Yeah, get the whitest white boys.

Speaker 1:
[53:37] And let me, just because people will say, Netanyahu wasn't funding Hamas, he allowed money to go through, but that's the, but yes, same thing, if you're going to be outraged about that, then you should absolutely treat this the same. Let me make it really, really clear. Remember everyone talking about tiki torches that sort of became a symbol for white supremacy, that's because of Unite the Right? Those tiki torches very likely were purchased with money from the SPLC. Without the SPLC, the Charlottesville rally would have looked quite a bit different. It just looks like a Christmas Eve service.

Speaker 4:
[54:15] Yeah, they're just mourning in their statue.

Speaker 1:
[54:17] Do not, and I will tell you this, this is how they set it up, right? Hashtag believe all women. Okay, well I want to believe all women. And then they feed, they pay for, they support the lies. How many examples do you need of that? You have Duke LaCrosse, you have Mattress Girl, you had the UVA scandal, you had a bunch of these famous actresses, people come forward and wealthy men who are targeted by gold diggers. Just believe all, you set it up. And then you set it up with people vote for Donald Trump because they're racist. Well, I don't like racism. See, look, look, look, look, these people who support them. They're racist. No, no. Those are your plants. So they try and put themselves really in a category that cannot be criticized. Believe all women. What, do you support rapists? Hey, we shouldn't be harming children, Miss Rachel, right? So why would you have any type of immigration policy? You're not a racist, are you? Well, aren't you upset that all of the other voters for Donald Trump are racist? No, they're not. Just the ones that you pay for. Do not give an inch. I will tell you, I want you to switch your mindset. And I mean this. Believe all women? No. Question all claims. Always. Hey, don't you think that, insert group here? No. Even if it's stop Asian hate, immediately ask questions. Well, what do you mean? What's Asian hate? What's going on? There's an increase in hate crimes? Okay. Oh, it turned out it's black people. That's why it went away. Whatever the left claims, what do they claim you need to do? Their first blanket statement. That's how they set the stage. Immediately deny it. Do not give an inch on any of it, because that's how we get Jesse Smollett. That's how we get Bubba Wallace. That's how we get Poop Swastika. That's how we get the Covington Kids. That's how we get Tawana Brawley. That's how we get the Duke Lacrosse students. If you change your mindset and enough of you do it, we can live in a fundamentally different country where lives are not destroyed from bad actors. There are bad actors on the right. They're almost all exclusively bad actors on the left. And I truly mean that. CNN? They're not acting in good faith. MSNOW? They're not acting in good faith. ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times? They're not acting in good faith. I could go to more examples, but Russiagate, Eugene Carroll and Donald Trump said very fine people on both sides, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists. All of them went with that unquestioned. Every leftist institution that I know of, you can let me know if I need to stand corrected. They act in bad faith by design. You don't see this on the right. We are not the same. And they still do, by the way. They will today. I guarantee you, these organizations right now, the ones you just named, will be running pieces about this indictment, and they will mention Donald Trump saying that about the Charlottesville incident, and they won't correct it at all. Destiny, that soulless ghoul online, has already done it. Again, it's still, it's nine years later. Well, and he's a liar, and people know that he knows better, and he said that it's okay to lie. He said that. That's why there won't be a debate. I'm not going to debate with someone who's like, yeah, it's okay to lie if I need to do that to win. Remember when I did black and white on the gray issues at the barbershop? Yeah. I said, wait, what if I were to tell you that Donald Trump actually specifically said, I'm not saying neo-Nazis and white supremacists who should be condemned totally, and what if I showed you that video? And they go, I ain't seen it, I have to see it. I go, but if I'm not lying to you, would it change your mind? I don't know, I'd have to see it. Meaning, it still wouldn't be enough proof? They actually believe it. You have probably tens of millions of people in this country who still believe that. Thanks SPLC, and I hope that some of them go to jail. I hope people get seriously punished for this. We are not the same, and we are not the same as other shows. You know a lot of other shows, they take your super chats and they go, rattle their tin cup. We don't do it. We give you, we give you super chats. Reverse it. That's right, 50 free Rumble Premium subscriptions were just gifted in the chat thanks to Rumble Wallet. Download the Rumble Wallet, an easy way to manage all of your crypto in one place. Streamlined, one stop shop, the link is in the description. If you were just gifted a subscription, take a screenshot. You can tag me on X or on Instagram. Let us know how you like the Rumble Premium subscription. Now you know, explore, explore around, enjoy things ad free, watch all the different content on there. Also go and call your father figure because you shouldn't be letting us stuff a free reverse super chat in your underoos. That's it.

Speaker 4:
[58:58] That's it.

Speaker 1:
[59:02] All right, we gotta do this. This one's fun. You know, I've said this and I really, now I've been spending more time, we all have watching female centric content, particularly female centric advice content. It's always bad. I know you shouldn't speak and gross generalizations. I'm fine with it. I'm really, really fine with it.

Speaker 6:
[59:22] You're so much more right than you are wrong.

Speaker 1:
[59:25] I haven't seen good advice.

Speaker 6:
[59:26] I know.

Speaker 1:
[59:27] I haven't seen good advice from public female figures. Yeah. Not once have I seen it yet. Certainly not as a method of programming. So if you are not, here's Exhibit Z5412. Swedish singer, Zara Larsson. If you guys aren't familiar with her, here's her rant on abortion to maybe jog your memory.

Speaker 25:
[59:50] I've seen this comment that I made on a page that was saying she got an abortion after the show. I was like, yes, I killed the performance, and then you killed it after the performance. Like, sorry, that's funny. Like, I don't know what to say. That's funny. Sorry if you don't have humor. Why can't it just be okay for a woman to want to have an abortion?

Speaker 1:
[60:09] Do you really want me to list the ways? First off, don't really like you telling other people that they need to have a sense of humor because it's quite clear that you don't. Second, it's ending a life. That's a big thing. It's careless. It's bad advice. It shows that you're a sociopath. It's also emblematic of the degradation of our society. She also posted this on Instagram just so you guys get the kind of claims and advice being given out. She wrote, I love immigrants. I love criminals. I love trans people. I love abortions. I love queers. I love slutty women. I love contraception. I love welfare. I love socialism. I effing hate ICE. And so of course she's going to be given a platform on the Call Her Daddy podcast. But let's just look at that again. The left makes these claims. Now what they believe they are making is a virtuous claim. Everything she just said she thinks is, yeah, this is going to be really, this is going to be really good for me. Let's go through that and apply the logic that the feminist left they're allergic to. It's like garlic to a vampire. I love immigrants. Okay, why? That's a racist statement. There are good immigrants, there are bad immigrants. I love criminals. Why? That's not racist, you're just a stupid person. That's a very stupid statement to make. I love, what do you mean?

Speaker 4:
[61:16] Which criminals? Rapists, murderers? Just thieves, you like thieves or drug dealers? Which ones?

Speaker 1:
[61:22] Irina Zaruzka, the man who sliced her throat. You like Decarlos Brown Jr., you love criminals? It's a stupid statement. I love trans people. Why? You hate science? You hate biology? I love abortions. Why? Beyond just being selfish and cruel, what is the virtue of abortion? I love queers. Why? Oh, it's tokenism. So there's no reason to say I love queers. There are some awful queers. By the way, I'm also glad that now we can say queers. You weren't allowed to say it. Remember Joe the Plumber, he was fired for using the word queers.

Speaker 4:
[61:54] Are we allowed to smear them?

Speaker 1:
[61:56] It depends what you're smearing them with.

Speaker 6:
[61:57] If it's a game, but if it's a game, yes.

Speaker 1:
[61:59] There's a lot of smearing going on at the Folsom Street. It's just tokenism. It's a stupid statement. If you pick 100 queers, is there going to be one who you don't like? I would wager most of them I don't like. I love slutty women. Why? Oh, to try and ease your own guilt. I love contraception. Why? See previous answer. I love welfare. Why? Because you want to destroy the human spirit. I love socialism. Why? Because you support murder, historically. Regime is responsible for more deaths, more genocide than any other ideology in the history of the modern world or arguably the world period. I think hate ICE. Why? Why do you hate ICE? Why do you hate people who are doing their job trying to keep Americans safe and trying to ensure that our vote isn't stolen? It's just a stupid thing. The point is she puts this out there and she's never, it's as simple as this. These people in Hollywood, these people in the entertainment industry, these elitists, they don't have anyone around them and they just go, what? That's it. Just imagine if she had a dad and a few people around her, she's like, I love criminals. And they're like, don't say that.

Speaker 4:
[63:09] Yeah, unless you're a student in Yuma, Arizona, don't say that.

Speaker 1:
[63:11] Yeah, I love welfare. Like, that's just, just stop. You're saying stupid things. You just said a lot of stupid things thinking that they sound anything other than stupid. But here's the thing, you heard all that and that's to make a point. So this is asinine. The people on the Feminist Left or the Call Her Daddy Podcast or Call Me, whatever it is that they call, they hear that. They go, oh, this is someone with something interesting to say. She says what I like to hear said. And that's why it brings us to our newest installment of Call Me Daddy.

Speaker 7:
[63:44] Oh, he shoots threes on and off the court.

Speaker 23:
[63:47] Don't love your job, job your love for all that was family history.

Speaker 24:
[63:51] It's because of male desire.

Speaker 1:
[63:53] Can you f*** off enough?

Speaker 4:
[64:00] Tell us about it, Daddy.

Speaker 12:
[64:02] Oh, don't, you don't do it.

Speaker 3:
[64:04] The screen told me to do it. I know, but I don't want you to.

Speaker 4:
[64:07] What's the problem, Daddy?

Speaker 1:
[64:08] I want the, stop.

Speaker 4:
[64:11] We still having lunch together later, Daddy?

Speaker 1:
[64:13] Son of a b***h.

Speaker 4:
[64:14] Yes.

Speaker 23:
[64:14] Okay.

Speaker 1:
[64:17] Yes, Mommy.

Speaker 4:
[64:19] Does that make Gerald Grandad? Fine.

Speaker 1:
[64:24] I'm trying to do the math. I don't know. Either way, it's disturbing. And if you're not yet a member, hey, we're going to get, this is going to get probably, probably wild and woolly. You can click that button. Join Rumble Premium. MugClub is Rumble Premium. Rumble Premium is MugClub. 100% more show. You get the Friday show. You get everything ad free and all these other creators that you see here. It's your one stop shop. Call her daddy after all those stupid things that you saw. Again, we need women who will give other women good advice. They just don't exist. By and large, there are always exceptions. The truth is, the women who would actually give good advice, they're typically not public figures because they're doing, they're taking their own advice. They're supporting a family. They're being mothers. They're being wives. They're being active pillars of their community. They're not going out there chasing social media clout. Here is Larson on this social media clout chasing podcast, claiming that she hated men before it was cool.

Speaker 25:
[65:23] I've been like beefing with people online since I was like 14.