transcript

Speaker 1:
[00:06] Did you know about one in three people with plaque psoriasis may also develop psoriatic arthritis, which causes joint pain, stiffness and swelling? Does this sound like you? Listen to what it sounds like to be a million miles away. Chirmpaya, Goussoukoumab, taken by injection, is a prescription medicine for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, who may benefit from taking injections or pills or phototherapy, and for adults with active psoriatic arthritis. Serious allergic reactions and increased risk of infections and liver problems may occur. Before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms or if you need a vaccine. Imagine being a million miles away. Explore what's possible. Ask your doctor about Chirmpaya. Tap this ad to learn more about Chirmpaya, including important safety information.

Speaker 2:
[01:06] This episode is brought to you by Adobe Firefly, the all-in-one creative studio with AI-powered image and video generation. Built for today's creative process, Firefly helps you generate, edit, and experiment fast. Because the asks aren't getting smaller and the timelines, yeah, still tight. With all the best creative AI models in one place, Firefly brings your ideas to life. Learn more at adobe.com/firefly.

Speaker 3:
[01:35] Speech is now being remade by analyzing a talker's speech or the fundamental speech information and then using this information to remake the speech with a synthesizing device. This is the all-buzz condition and we are now remaking speech out of buzzer type energy, both in the case of voiced sounds and unvoiced sounds.

Speaker 4:
[01:59] What you're hearing is the first demonstration of a vocoder recorded all the way back in 1939. Invented by Bell Labs, the vocoder is a device that analyzes, compresses and reconstructs the human voice, originally developed to make long-distance transmissions more efficient. At its core, the vocoder requires two inputs, a human voice which provides the articulation, things like vowels and consonants, and a second signal that provides the tone. And notably, the pitch doesn't come from a speaker's voice, but from that second signal. So instead of a person naturally raising or lowering their voice, the machine controls the pitch externally.

Speaker 3:
[02:35] This pitch can be set at almost any place by manipulation of the hand pitch dial. And now we're going up a good deal higher. And this is the condition with the dial all the way over to the right. Now let us put the dial all the way over to the left.

Speaker 4:
[02:53] While the technology wasn't designed for musical purposes, even these early engineers understood its potential. In this same recording, the demonstrator sets the vocoder to harmonize with its voice and then sings a little tune.

Speaker 5:
[03:04] Good night ladies, good night ladies, good night ladies, we're going to leave you now.

Speaker 4:
[03:12] Bell Labs went so far as to record a full song using the vocoder, an Irish folk tune called Love's Old Sweet Song. Remember, this was recorded all the way back in the 1930s. Aside from these early demonstrations, the Vocoder wouldn't find its way into music in a meaningful way into the late 60s and early 70s. In 1971, Wendy Carlos famously used the Vocoder to voice the choir parts in Beethoven's Ninth Symphony in her score for Stanley Kubrick's O'Clockwork Orange. In the years that followed, the Vocoder found its way into the hands of Kraftwerk, the German electronic pioneers who deliberately tied its mechanical sound to the image of a robot. As the technology improved, becoming smaller, more affordable, and easier to use, the Vocoder began to find its way into popular music throughout the 1980s. You can hear it on African Bambada's 1982 hit Planet Rock. And on Michael Jackson's 1983 smash, PYT. By the time Daft Punk began making music in the 90s, the vocoders part human, part synthetic sound made it the perfect tool to capture the digital spirit of their robot personas. And while the vocoders' synthetic, monotone qualities have long been associated with robots, Daft Punk pushed that relationship further than anyone before them, transforming it from a novelty effect into a philosophical exploration of humanity's evolving relationship with machines. And their mastery of the vocoder was essential to that exploration. Because they didn't just use it to sound like robots, they used it to sound like robots trying to sound human, robots searching for emotion, for connection, for something real. The vocoder could also invert that idea, giving voice to humans becoming more like machines, optimizing for efficiency and productivity, often at the expense of human experience. This intersection between humans and their machines is the central tension Daft Punk would explore across their entire career. And the earliest, clearest expression of this idea is Discovery's fourth track, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger, a song that doesn't just give voice to a robot through the vocoder, doesn't just contain one of the greatest vocoder solos ever recorded, is a song that ingeniously uses the vocoder to turn rapid technological evolution into something you can actually hear unfolding in real time. And I can't wait to show you exactly how they did it. For the Ringer Podcast Network, this is Dissect, long-form musical analysis broken into short digestible episodes. Today we continue our examination of Daft Punk's Discovery with its fourth track, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger. I'm your host, Cole Cuchna. Daft Punk's Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger is primarily composed of samples from a single source, 1979's Cola Bottle Baby by funk and disco musician Edwin Birdsong. The main loop is pulled from the song's opening moments. As you just heard, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger is not far from the original Cola Bottle Baby. However, it is a little more chopped than it might initially seem. The first thing we need to do is pitch it up, which also increases its speed. Now, the next thing we need to do is recognize some subtle differences in the original sample source. In Cola Bottle Baby's intro, the band plays the main part, then repeats that same part again. And because it's a live band, there's some small differences in the repetition. For example, here's the part's first chord. Now, here's that same chord when the part starts over. Did you notice anything different? Listen again, this time back to back. The first time there's a crash cymbal strike, the second time there's not. The synth is also slightly busier the second time, while in the first it's cleaner. Don't worry if you're having trouble hearing the differences. They're very subtle and that's exactly why I'm pointing them out. Because, this is the level of detail Daft Punk is working at, identifying those nuances and making deliberate choices between them. Understanding this, let's now look at how they assembled the song's main loop. The first chop is a pretty decent chunk, taking the first four chords from take one. Now if they kept sampling this same take, it would have sounded like this. Instead, they chopped this same part from the second take. For whatever reason, they preferred this one, so they glued it together with the first chop. But again, instead of letting that second chop continue to complete the loop, they switched back to take one for this last little bit. I'm guessing they liked this version better because it's cleaner. The other take has a pretty startling extra bass note and more chord hits. Again small details, but Daft Punk were clearly A-B testing every fragment when creating this loop. Let's now hear it in full as it appears in the song. Okay, so you might think we're done, but we're not. Because Daft Punk don't just repeat this same loop over and over. They do repeat it once, like we just heard, but on the third repetition they switch to a new loop. It's very, very similar, but technically it is different. In this new loop, the second and third chops stay the same, but chop one, that main chunk, now comes from take two, the one without the crash symbol and a few other minor differences. This is combined with chops two and three to create the second loop, which like the first is also played twice. Now, I know this was a bit tedious to break down, but that was kind of the point. What seems like a simple loop sampled verbatim from its source material actually reveals itself as being much more complex when put under a microscope. And composing with this level of detail is one of the things that separate Daft Punk from everyone else. Most producers would have just sampled the loop verbatim and called it good. And it would have been good. But as we've witnessed all season so far, Daft Punk is always willing to go the extra mile. Even if most listeners never consciously notice it, even if it makes the song just 2 or 3 percent better, they're going to put in that work. Now that we've broken down the main loop, I do want to return to the song's intro because the way Daft Punk built it is really cool. Here's what it sounds like on the record. Alright, so while most of the main sample loop comes from Cola Bottle Baby's first 20 seconds or so, we have to go all the way to the end of the song to find the sound used in this introduction. Because it's around the 4 minute and 49 second mark that we hear this. Did you catch it? Yes, Daft Punk seemingly combed through the entire 5 minute track and honed in on this 1 second fragment. And then they looped it. Next they take this tiny fragment from the end of the song and combine it with another fragment from its beginning. It comes from this part of the main sample loop. Let's clip out the small fragment we need from this section and loop it. Now let's hear how these 2 loops come together in the song's filtered intro. I mean, how cool is that? But even cooler still is the extra little flourish Daft Punk creates just before the main sample loop kicks in. You know, this one. To create this little fill, they slice out just the initial kick and bass hits from the chords in the main sample loop. So from this chord, they slice out this, and from this chord, they slice out this, and so on until we have these punches to work with. From these, they create this little sequence. Again, when I'm talking about Daft Punk consistently going the extra mile, this is exactly what I'm talking about. That intro is already great just with the two fragments, and for most that would be enough. But no, they found that extra little detail that really puts the part over the top, one that bridges perfectly from the intro into the main loop. We observed a similar detail when analyzing the intro of Homework's Defunk. There, the standard drum beat suddenly cuts to a sped up drum sample used only once in the entire song, acting as a fill that makes the entrance of the bassline much more impactful. These kinds of small compositional details add up over the course of an artistic career. They show up time and time again in the great works of art across history. I mean, there's thousands of artists that can paint a portrait of Mona Lisa, but it was Da Vinci who dissected multiple cadavers in order to learn how the buccinator muscle and jawbone create facial expressions, and then worked obsessively to apply those details to as Mona Lisa's iconic smile. Likewise, thousands of producers could sample Cola Bottle Baby, but only Daft Punk could turn it into a meticulously designed electronic music classic. And their attention to detail and the accumulation of those details is one of the reasons why. As Harder, Better progresses, we are met with the first iterations of the vocoder vocals. Specifically Daft Punk used one called the Digitech Talker, a compact unit the size of a guitar pedal. As we touched on earlier, a vocoder essentially allows an instrument to talk by using the shape of a human voice, things like vowels and consonants, to sculpt another sound, usually a synth or guitar, which controls the pitch. Creatively, you can lean into the lack of inflection and natural expression to create a monotone robotic effect, or you can take advantage of controlling the pitch with an instrument and make your voice do things no human voice could do alone. So for example, I can plainly say the words, this is how a vocoder works, and using a synth to control the pitch, we can make it sound robotic, or saying that same exact expression the exact same way, I can make it sound wild like this. As we'll hear, Daft Punk take advantage of both use cases, beginning with a monotone robotic sound performing two-word fragments, work it, make it, do it, makes us. Each two-word fragment is sung with a single monotone pitch, work it is two F sharps, make it is also two F sharps but an octave higher, and do it makes us follows the same pattern, this time on an A. Leaning into these monotone pitches plays into the classic portrayal of a stereotypical robot. Variation in pitch or inflection is a distinctly human trait, one that conveys the emotion behind our words. A flat monotone delivery by contrast suggests rigidity and emotional absence. This idea works in tandem with the lyrics. Robots are typically built to perform specific tasks, to work endlessly without fatigue, without distraction, without the physical or mental limitations of humans. In terms of productivity, our need for food, rest and emotional balance renders us inefficient by comparison. But those are precisely the areas where robots excel, making them ideal workers who, in this case, seem almost proud of their ability to operate without such limits. And that leads directly into the next phrase, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger. Lyrically, this completes the full line, work it, make it, do it, makes us, harder, better, faster, stronger. This is a kind of mantric feedback loop, where work leads to improvement, improvement leads to efficiency, and efficiency leads to increased production. Each cycle reinforces the next, a continual wheel of quote unquote progress. And, melodically, these vocal phrases evolve slightly from the first. Instead of each phrase getting a single note, each two syllable word now gets two notes. As you just heard, the overall shape of the melodic line is descending, it goes lower and lower. This contrasts the first melodic line, which was ascending. Together they create a pretty satisfying arc. The first phrase rises, the second phrase falls. So just as the two parts are connected lyrically, work it, make it, do it makes us, harder, better, faster, stronger, they're also connected melodically. We'll keep this in mind as we continue to progress throughout the song. Musically, this section mirrors the first, but the lyrics become even more fragmented, leaning further into that primitive robotic quality, like the early attempts at making machines speak. It says, more than power, power, never, ever after work is over. It's not entirely coherent, but the general idea comes through, working power after power, pushing toward a point where the work is finally done. At this point in the narrative, it hints at a kind of end goal, that all this striving for efficiency, this drive to become harder, better, faster, stronger is leading somewhere. The implication seems to be that if we become optimized enough, if we work hard and efficiently enough, work itself will one day become obsolete. This is the unstated, invisible goal behind our drive for quote unquote progress, an idea Daft Punk will return to later in the song. But first, they do something very cool musically. And to understand how, we have to notice something about where exactly these lyrical fragments have been placed within each measure. Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger is in 4-4 time, meaning there are four quarter notes per measure. Now, I'm going to count along again, this time during the vocals, work it, make it, do it, makes us. As you listen, notice how they're placed directly on beats one and three. Now, let's do the same thing with the next set of phrases, harder, better, faster, stronger. And notice these are placed not on the one and three, but on beats two and four. So we have one melodically ascending set of phrases placed on beats 1 and 3, and the other descending set on beats 2 and 4. This same pattern repeats on the next section. More Than Our, Our Never falls on 1 and 3, while the response Ever After, Work Is Over falls on 2 and 4. All of these phrases are pretty spaced out. There are large gaps between the phrases filled by instrumental music, and it takes 8 measures to perform Work It, Make It, Do It, Makes Us, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger, and 8 measures to perform More Than Our, Our Never, Ever After, Work Is Over. That's a total of 16 measures to perform such a small amount of text. In terms of productivity, our robots aren't being very efficient. They are working slowly, their speech is monotone and primitive, and their words disrupt the flow of the instrumental. But no need to fear, because their words reflect their programming. They will keep working tirelessly until they become stronger, better, faster and more efficient. And as the song continues, that's exactly what happens. Some of you are probably realizing what's happening here and it's really, really cool. Daft Punk designed the vocal parts as modular units. They work on their own independently like we heard at the start when the opening phrases are spaced out, placed on the ones and threes, and then on the twos and fours. But as we just heard, they also work when played simultaneously, where they snap together like parts in an assembly line, filling all four beats in the measure continuously. And to be clear, the individual phrases didn't change. They are saying the same words, singing the same notes. It's just that now they're being performed within the same measure. So what began as awkwardly staccato, monotone and inefficiently spaced out. Becomes more fluid, melodic, expressive and logically coherent. But what's really amazing about this is that it isn't just a cool musical trick. It perfectly reflects the central theme of the song. We're literally hearing the robots become more efficient in real time. What once took eight measures now happens in four, a 50% improvement. And it's not just more efficient, it's also more musical. When the parts interlock, the monotone rigidity becomes much more fluid, creating melodic balance while maintaining a clear musical arc. The product is improving as its production accelerates. It's becoming faster, better, stronger right before our ears. Pretty fucking cool, right? Now, there's also some new lyrical and thematic changes to consider when these parts interlock together, especially with the second lyrical set. More than ever, hour after hour, work is never over. First, let's recognize the clever wordplay here, as Daft Punk create a homophone with the second, hour, where it can be heard as both hour after hour, the passage of time, and our work is never over, a statement of ownership. Thematically, this flips the meaning entirely. In the first iteration, it seemed to suggest that after enough hours, the work might eventually end. But here, that illusion is gone and the truth is revealed. Hour after hour, our work is never over. In this sense, it's becoming clear that the song is pointing to something larger thematically, a broad examination of the human idea of progress. We build tools and machines to make our labor more efficient, always moving toward some imagined future where that efficiency finally frees us from work altogether. It's the idea that if we optimize enough, work hard enough, long enough, methodically enough, we'll one day live simpler, happier, more peaceful lives as a species. It's a promise we hear all the time today, especially from leaders in artificial intelligence, that machines will take over the menial labor, freeing us from the burden of work. But what's often left unaddressed is what we give up to get there, and the new problems that future might create. Problems that could prove even more complex and labor-intensive than the ones we face today. Oh, and then there's that small matter of AI becoming autonomous beyond our control, a risk that may well threaten our very existence, a possibility acknowledged by many of the people building these systems. And yet, despite the risks, despite the uncertainty, we keep pushing forward, almost compulsively. It's as if the drive to improve, to evolve, to get harder, better, faster, stronger, is something we're incapable of resisting, even if the end of work comes at a cost we may not survive. Now, understanding the evolutionary arc of the vocal part over time, we recognize that in the section we just heard, the lyrics condense even more. Before, there was still an extended instrumental gap between work it harder, make it better, do it faster, makes it stronger, and more than ever, hour after hour, work is never over. But here, the two sections are fully merged into a single unbroken melodic phrase that fuses all the lyrics into one fluid sentence. The result is another 50% reduction in time, four total measures down from the previous eight, and a full 75 reduction from the original 16. Talk about efficiency. Our robot is performing its task quite well. And as the track continues, so too does the robot's improvements. Having fully connected the vocal parts, the robot advances to redesigning the melody itself. It's now no longer just combining those existing fragments, repeating the same two bar melody for both sections. Instead, it has now composed a new melody that's optimized for this new truncated iteration, featuring a sweeping melodic arc that spans the entire four bar phrase. This vocal part is far removed from its choppy, monotone origins. It's another new and improved iteration, like an OS or hardware update that's somehow faster and more beautiful all at once. Now, another interesting thing about this vocal line is how it suddenly takes center stage, becoming the predominant feature of the track. In the first half of the song, the instrumental was the star, and the robotic vocal fragments almost awkwardly interjected themselves into the loop. Now the roles have reversed. The vocals are continuous, while the instrumental has become more choppy and fragmented. Here's the passage we just heard with the vocals removed, so you can hear this more clearly. If we accept that Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger is constructed as a musical analogy, which to me by now feels undeniable, then the robotic vocal taking over as the lead while the instrumental recedes reflects a larger transformation, mirroring the way technology has moved from clunky, error-prone tools to something seamlessly integrated and more and more difficult to separate from our lives. However, the evolution doesn't stop here, because while the vocals have improved exponentially, it's still pretty tame in terms of its melody and rhythm. It's playing a nice, well-composed melody, but its range is limited, and rhythmically it's just straight, predictable eighth notes with no variation. What's missing from this vocal part is a sense of unpredictability, things like vocal inflection, melodic spontaneity, expressiveness and virtuosity. In other words, it's missing the qualities that often convey emotion. It's missing the human touch. That is, until what happens next. Always improving, always optimizing, the vocal suddenly erupts into what will become an extended minute long vocoder solo. Continuing its song long evolution, our robot gains more and more musical skill. Now using the established vocal line as a base to improvise off of, rather than rigid, predictable eighth notes, it plays the melody using swung jazzy syncopation. It follows this by harmonizing with itself for the first time, playing two notes of fourth apart simultaneously, before launching into a finger tapping guitar style flourish. A robot has clearly learned some new tricks, breaking even further from its rigid, monotone origins. This part of the solo comes to a pretty definitive resolution and could easily end here. But like we heard in Digital Love, Daft Punk extends the solo further than we'd ever expect, which only works if you continually outdo yourself. And after a brief instrumental breakdown, they do exactly that, as we witness the robot growing more and more powerful, expressive and virtuosic all at once. Here at the climactic moment of the solo, the robot has abandoned the established melody in favor of virtuosic flourishes in its highest register. We still hear fragments of the lyrics peeking through, so it's technically still singing, but it's almost totally unintelligible to us mortal humans. Our robot has advanced beyond its creators, performing its task better than humanly possible. Of course, this is the metaphoric reading of the track. Toma and Gimon are the creators of this exquisite and totally unique solo, pushing the vocoder into uncharted territory, both sonically and thematically. I mean, have we ever heard anything like this in the history of music? A wild vocoder solo over a spliced up disco sampling dance track that simultaneously functions as a philosophical exploration of humanity's relationship to its exponentially evolving technology. Yeah, I don't think so. Now to really reinforce just how far the robot has evolved since it first entered, I want to play a condensed version of the vocals I put together, stitching all the main progression points into a single sequence so we can hear its evolution in one sitting. Notice how it begins fragmented, almost sputtering, like a child learning to speak, and with each iteration evolves exponentially in complexity, range, speed, dexterity and expressiveness until it reaches superhuman capabilities.

Speaker 6:
[31:43] Work it, make it, do it, make sense.

Speaker 4:
[32:38] Pretty cool, right? Hearing it in one sequence really makes the evolution clear. From rigid, mechanical fragments to something expressively human. Something that pushes beyond what a human alone can perform. It's a fascinating idea and an incredibly difficult one to execute, both technically and aesthetically. Because for me, what makes Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger truly remarkable is how subtly this idea is executed. It doesn't turn the song into an indulgent mess justified by its thematic philosophy. It still works perfectly as a fun, immediate dance track even if you never think about the underlying concept that informs the entire structure of the song. I mean, I wasn't aware of the extent of this layer myself until sitting down to write this episode. But once you hear it, it's impossible to ignore. And you can even argue this mirrors the way technology has evolved. Gradual, incremental change until suddenly we look up and realize how deeply it's now embedded into every aspect of our lives. Indeed, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger is in many ways an early blueprint in Daft Punk's catalog, a clear signal of what would become a central theme in their work. Thematically, the song is a microcosm of what they would go on to explore throughout their entire career, using their robot personas to examine the relationship between humanity and technology at the dawn of the 21st century. A century that seems destined to be defined by its exponential technological growth. And the reality is, we're only in the beginning stages. We all understand life will soon look dramatically different. We just don't know exactly how or whether that change will be ultimately for the better. But what is certain is that technology will be central to that change. Because human history offers little evidence that we'll ever voluntarily choose to move backwards. Instead, we move forward compulsively. Not because we fully understand where we're going. But because the promise of progress has always been irresistible in humanity's endless pursuit of becoming harder, better, faster, stronger.