transcript

Speaker 1:
[00:00] Hi, this is Civics 101, I'm Hannah McCarthy.

Speaker 2:
[00:02] And I'm Nick Capodice, and I guess we're just jumping in? No warm up, no archival, just going right into this?

Speaker 1:
[00:09] Well, I do have a question for you, but it sounds a lot like a question we might ask at the beginning of an ad, which this is not. This is a real show. We are not trying to sell you on anything, but we are going to talk about something that you're probably hearing a lot of ads about right now. And that is taxes.

Speaker 3:
[00:32] Oh, dear.

Speaker 1:
[00:33] We'll get to that after a quick break.

Speaker 4:
[00:41] Tax Act is here any time you want to easily file your taxes. Tax Act is here for the early birds who like to knock them out as soon as the season opens, and for the procrastinators who like to wait until the very last minute. Tax Act is also here for the middlers who file right in the middle of tax season. No one ever talks about the middlers, but Tax Act sees you and Tax Act respects you. Tax Act, let's get them over with.

Speaker 5:
[01:12] Spring Fest is heating up at Lowe's, and for a limited time, we have the extra big deals you need to impress guests. Get your outdoor space ready and save $50 on the select Cobalt 24-volt blower kit. Now $79. Plus, save $80 on the Charbroil Performance 4-burner grill. Now $199. It's springtime, and our best lineup is here at Lowe's. Valid to 413. While supplies last, selection varies by location.

Speaker 3:
[01:45] They say everybody's got different problems. Well, maybe so, but I've got a song about one problem that every one of us have, and that's taxes.

Speaker 1:
[01:56] So I solemnly swear I'm not about to sell you a tax service, but I do want to ask, do any of these questions sound familiar to you? How many kids do you have? Do you work from home? Did you save for retirement? Did you pay tuition? How about student loans? Did you get money from an inheritance? Did you buy an electric vehicle? Did you donate to a charity? Did you buy a house? Sell a house? How big is your office?

Speaker 2:
[02:17] Yeah, I'm familiar with all those questions, Hannah, because I answer them when I file my taxes.

Speaker 1:
[02:22] And Nick, if you don't mind me asking, how did you do your taxes last year?

Speaker 2:
[02:28] Well, after I put them off, I used an account. Right.

Speaker 1:
[02:32] Like you, most Americans need help figuring out how much money we owe the government each year. About 90 percent of people use technology like TurboTax or hire a human tax preparer to do their tax return. Tax season requires an enormous amount of time, money, and resources. Not only from the government, but from us, the taxpayers.

Speaker 2:
[02:54] It is pretty confounding, Hannah, that we live in a country where you basically need a degree in accounting or the money to pay for someone with a degree or computer software just to comply with the law. It's hard to understand how that's a good thing.

Speaker 1:
[03:08] You raise a good point, so I want to introduce you to someone named Beverly Moran. She's a professor of law and sociology at Vanderbilt University, where she focuses on federal income taxation. She's testified before Congress and written extensively about the complexity of our income tax system.

Speaker 6:
[03:25] I mean, when people talk about being able to have a tax return on a postcard, that was basically the amount of information you had to put on a return for most people. But the problem is as the tax started to filter to the whole country, there was another sort of movement going on, which caused the return to become much more frightening. And what that was, was that we started to put a lot of things into the tax system that really weren't about taxes. In preparation for talking to you, I reached out to several friends of mine who have like decades of experience. You know, we're tax preparers, right? They know the taxpayer side and they know the government side. They were all saying to me, like, how can you say any of it is good? How could you come up with a story? Like, and I'm saying, well, I want to say this and that, and they were like, well, good for you that you can come up with this story. Because it's not good. It's horrible.

Speaker 1:
[04:39] So today on Civics 101, we're going to talk about why our income tax system is the way it is. Full of complexity, difficult to navigate, and extremely personal. Where circumstances like who you work for, what kind of resources you have, and how you spend your money are directly connected to how much you owe the government each year and what the government provides for you in return.

Speaker 2:
[05:05] Just to clarify, you said federal income taxes, so we're leaving states out of it. We're not talking about state, local, sales tax, anything like that.

Speaker 1:
[05:13] Right, because that's a whole other subject entirely. Every state and many municipalities have their own tax system and they vary widely. We're focused today on federal income taxes, specifically those taxes that individuals like you and me pay every year out of the money we earn. And to start, I think we should get a better sense of how much income taxes matter.

Speaker 7:
[05:40] So the federal income tax is our largest single source of revenue for the federal government. It raises roughly 50 percent of federal receipts.

Speaker 1:
[05:50] This is Eric Toder. He's an Institute Fellow at the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center. He worked in tax policy for the Treasury Department at the IRS and in the Congressional Budget Office. He also worked as a consultant for the New Zealand Treasury.

Speaker 7:
[06:04] But there are other big taxes. The second biggest tax is the payroll tax, which people may feel is similar to an income tax because it also comes out of their paycheck. And for most people in this country, the payroll tax is a bigger tax than the income tax. The income tax is a very progressive tax. It rises steeply as a rate of tax with your income. Whereas the payroll tax is a flat rate tax.

Speaker 1:
[06:32] The payroll tax is a flat tax set at 15.3%. Your employer pays half and you pay half.

Speaker 2:
[06:39] Right, but Eric said that income tax is a progressive tax. So can you clarify for me the difference between a flat rate tax and a progressive tax?

Speaker 1:
[06:47] A flat rate tax is one that applies to everyone in the same amount, regardless of how much money they make. Like Social Security. If you made anywhere from zero dollars to a hundred and sixty thousand dollars, you pay 6.2% of your income to Social Security and your employer also pays 6.2%. If you're self-employed, you pay the full 12.4%. What makes our income tax progressive is that the more income you earn, the higher the tax rate is on that income.

Speaker 7:
[07:20] The third biggest source, which is significantly smaller, is the corporate income tax. But that's an important part of our tax system. Because without a tax on corporate income, people could avoid the income tax by accumulating income within corporations. So the corporation income tax, even though it raises only about 10% of federal revenues, is an important part of our tax system. There are other taxes, excise taxes, estate taxes, customs duties, they're small.

Speaker 2:
[07:50] Well, where does that revenue go? What kind of things does it pay for?

Speaker 1:
[07:54] It pays for the cost of running the government. It pays for all kinds of government programs, with social services being the biggest chunk, followed by defense and things like education, scientific research, infrastructure and natural resources.

Speaker 2:
[08:09] So I want to go back to how we got to this place. Did the Framers mention this at all in the Constitution? Like, have we always had an income tax?

Speaker 1:
[08:17] We have not. The Constitution says that Congress can set taxes to, quote, pay for the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. But the Framers favored indirect taxes, like sales taxes and tariffs, more than direct taxes on income.

Speaker 2:
[08:37] So indirect meaning like a tax on something that you're paying for. And theoretically could choose to pay for, rather than tax that automatically comes out of your paycheck.

Speaker 1:
[08:46] Correct.

Speaker 2:
[08:47] All right, so what changed? When did we finally get a permanent income tax?

Speaker 1:
[08:52] That happened in 1913, when we ratified the 16th Amendment. This amendment says the federal government has the right to impose income taxes. And more importantly, that the federal government does not have to distribute or apportion that revenue to states based on population size.

Speaker 8:
[09:09] Now, in the beginning, the tax is really narrow, only applies to a relative handful of Americans. And that's true, you know, up till the World War I, and then it gets broader and bigger. And then, but it's still, it's pretty minor tax. It's a rich man's burden, basically, right?

Speaker 6:
[09:24] Originally and even now, to some extent, it's a fantasy.

Speaker 1:
[09:28] Again, this is Beverly Moran.

Speaker 6:
[09:29] And the fantasy that it was selling between 1913 and the 1940s was that this was a way of having some sort of income redistribution.

Speaker 1:
[09:43] But the income tax wasn't just added to the already existing taxes. The government also lowered tariffs, which are taxes on imported and exported goods. Tariffs had been a main source of revenue after the Civil War and the rise of industrialization. But with that industrialization came business owners and investors who accumulated vast sums of wealth. People who used that wealth to exploit workers, monopolize industries, raise prices, and manipulate the markets for their own gain. So in an effort to lower tariffs and redistribute wealth without making big cuts to the government's budget, Congress shifted more of the tax burden directly onto the wealthiest Americans.

Speaker 6:
[10:28] The taxes were only like 3% of the population even had to file. Only about 1% of the population had to pay.

Speaker 1:
[10:37] But even so, the stock market crashed in 1929, which led to the Great Depression. It did indeed.

Speaker 9:
[10:43] Prosperity is just around the corner, say the hopeful headlines. But around the corners wind the lengthening bread lines, and a whole new class of citizens appears in American society, the new poor.

Speaker 1:
[10:58] Businesses failed, industries crashed, and when President Franklin Roosevelt was elected in 1933, he wasn't shy about using income tax to pay for economic recovery.

Speaker 10:
[11:10] My friends, I still believe in ideals. I am not for a return to that definition of liberty, under which for many years a free people were being gradually regimented into the service of the privileged few.

Speaker 1:
[11:31] For example, Roosevelt introduced the Revenue Act of 1935, which was targeted specifically at the wealthiest Americans, with tax rates that were as high as 75 percent. This helped fund the relatively new Social Security Administration, one of the New Deal welfare programs Roosevelt created after the Great Depression.

Speaker 2:
[11:51] Hannah, I am just trying to imagine something like a 75 percent income tax happening today, and I just cannot.

Speaker 1:
[11:57] By the way, at one point, the highest tax bracket only had one person, John D. Rockefeller. But at the same time that the federal government was heavily taxing the wealthy, it was also creating exceptions, asterisks, things that allowed people to get out of paying taxes on their entire income. Here's Joe Thorndyke.

Speaker 8:
[12:20] There was one moment where FDR says to his Treasury Secretary, I'd like a list of the top 50 taxpayers in 1942. I can't remember which year it was, but roughly around then. No names, of course. And then they give him a memo, which includes all the names. Roosevelt was famous for a lot of sort of anti-loophole, anti-tax avoidance crackdowns. And in 1937, I mean, he had the Treasury write him this memo. Again, there were two versions, one that had the names and one that didn't. But they made sure that those names made their way into the public sphere and that these guys were called out for using special little loopholes to try to avoid their taxes.

Speaker 1:
[13:07] We'll hear more about that after a quick break. All right, so if you haven't seen Clueless, it's amazing, it's Emma, you really should. I don't know why you haven't yet. You gotta get going on that. Anyway, if you have not seen Clueless, then you do not know that Cher Horowitz has this touchscreen computer thing that lets her see how potential outfits are going to look on her before she tries them on. And as a kid, I was certain that such a device would really up my game. That and a closet full of Cher's clothes. Now, my father is not a Beverly Hills litigator, and I am a thousand percent sure I could not afford an Alaya. Again, just watch the movie. But I do finally have a closet with pieces that I know are going to work even without a touchscreen preview. And that is thanks to Quince. Quince makes high quality clothes that last and paired together effortlessly, all without the aid of a virtual closet assistant. The washable silk skirt, cotton cashmere ribbed tank and Italian leather and eco-knit heeled mule. That is, as Cher would say, my most capable looking outfit. This spring, I'm planning to pair the one hundred percent linen shirt dress with the Italian leather hand woven tote. And I assure you that nobody is going to know that I live below sunset. And that's because Quince works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middlemen. So you're paying for and getting quality, not brand markup. Refresh your spring wardrobe with Quince. Go to quince.com/civics for free shipping and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. Go to Q UI nce.com/civics for free shipping and 365 day returns. quince.com/civics.

Speaker 2:
[15:04] Over the last three decades or so, the number of times that I, Nick Capodice, have gone to bed before midnight, I could probably count on one thumb. I don't really know why. I've just always dreaded going to bed because I feel like I'm going to miss something, you know? And I envy people who crave their bed at like nine or ten o'clock at night at a civilized time. Little did I know that if I just made my bed where I spend about a third of my life a touch more comfortable, I might be more eager to get into it. And I have made the leap and upgraded my bed with bowl and branch. I started out with their signature sheet set, and then less than a month later, I decided to get the waffle blanket. Every single thing that bowl and branch makes is breathable, cozy, and suddenly my bed is a thing I crave. Yes, it is still after midnight. I'm not going to change that anytime soon, but I finally am starting to get what other people are talking about. Upgrade your sleep with bowl and branch, and get 15% off your first order, plus free shipping at bowlandbranch.com/civics with code civics. That's bowlandbranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D, branch.com/civics, code civics to unlock 15% off. Exclusions apply. Good night, folks. From March of 2015 until I don't know exactly when, I was on a keto diet. You can put the pitchforks away. I'm not doing it anymore. And to be honest, I kind of regret all those years of drinking coffee with butter and coconut oil. So nowadays, you know, to sort of help my heart and my brain and my general sense of well-being, I'm doing a little bit more of a Mediterranean feel. To be clear, I am not on the, quote, Mediterranean diet. I'm just trying to eat more fish and salads and walking up and down a lot of hills at night. And Green Chef is making that so much more easy to do. If you don't know them, Green Chef is the farm fresh ingredients to doorstep delivery service. Each week, they send me over 40 recipes to choose from. The ingredients are mailed to me like a little present every Monday. And the fish and produce in particular are second to none. Eating healthy is effortless at this point. And my blood pressure has gone right down. So if you too want to eat healthier, easier with as little stress as possible, Green Chef is for you. Head to greenchef.com/50civics. That's five zero C-I-V-I-C-S. And use code 50 civics to get 50% off your first month and then 20% off the next two months. Again, that's code 50 civics at greenchef.com/50civics. See you on the hills.

Speaker 11:
[17:55] This podcast is sponsored by Talkspace.

Speaker 12:
[17:57] Last year, I went through many different life changes. I needed to take a pause and examine how I was feeling in the inside to better show up for the ones who need me to be my best version of myself.

Speaker 11:
[18:09] When you're navigating life's changes, Talkspace can help. Talkspace is the number one rated online therapy, bringing you professional support from licensed therapists and psychiatry providers that you can access anytime, anywhere.

Speaker 12:
[18:22] Living a busy life, navigating a long-distance relationship, becoming a first step father, Talkspace made all of those journeys possible. I could speak with my therapist in the office. I could speak with my therapist in the comfort of my home. I was never alone.

Speaker 11:
[18:36] Talkspace works with most major insurers, and most insured members have a zero-dollar copay, no insurance, no problem. Now get $80 off your first month with promo code SPACE80 when you go to talkspace.com. Match with a licensed therapist today at talkspace.com. Save $80 with code SPACE80 at talkspace.com.

Speaker 7:
[19:00] Well, we've always had certain exceptions in the income tax system.

Speaker 1:
[19:04] This is Eric Toder again.

Speaker 7:
[19:06] Modern federal income tax started in 1913. We had a capital gains preference introduced in 1921. We had mortgage interest deduction from the beginning. That wasn't very important because not very many people paid income tax, and not very many people owned homes when the federal income tax started. But it became important later.

Speaker 1:
[19:30] It became more important when our income taxes went from something that only affected a small group of people to something that applied to nearly everyone.

Speaker 2:
[19:39] I'm going to go with the episode trend so far, Hannah, and guess that a war had something to do with this.

Speaker 1:
[19:44] It did indeed. Once again, war. Specifically, World War II and the need to pay for it led to a major shift in our tax policy.

Speaker 7:
[20:14] Big government really dates from the Second World War, and that was when we introduced a mass income tax that applied to the majority of Americans.

Speaker 6:
[20:25] And again, the income tax becomes a way of communicating certain ideas. Like, this is like a victory guard, or this is like not wearing nylons, you know, we're all in it for the war effort.

Speaker 10:
[20:43] I'm only one of millions more, whose income never was taxed before. Our tax, I'm very glad to pay.

Speaker 2:
[20:51] Victory gardens, like, that's where the government encouraged people to grow their own food, to help reduce the demand needed to feed soldiers.

Speaker 1:
[20:59] Yeah, taxes were pitched in the same way. The propaganda around income taxes, like the song by Irving Berlin that you're hearing right now, were all about showing your support for the war effort by paying taxes.

Speaker 2:
[21:11] I got to say, it's a pretty jaunty little tune.

Speaker 8:
[21:15] When the number of taxpayers increases like sevenfold in a few years, millions of new people start paying the tax. The saying is that it went from being a class tax to a mass tax. That's when the Bureau of Internal Revenue became a fact of life for regular Americans, for middle-class Americans in particular.

Speaker 1:
[21:37] Like the previous income tax, the expanded mass income tax was a progressive, graduated tax. The higher your income, the higher your income tax rate.

Speaker 2:
[21:47] All right. So how did the Bureau handle this huge new tax base?

Speaker 1:
[21:52] Well, it got help from the Social Security Administration, which introduced Social Security numbers, so the Bureau of Internal Revenue could keep track of people's identities and income. Congress also made it possible for the Bureau of Internal Revenue to collect those taxes from someone's check before payday.

Speaker 6:
[22:11] I think every kid has this experience, right? You get a job, you're told you're going to get paid $100. You get the check, the check is $80. Like where did the other $20 go? But it's withholding. So when you think about it, when all this is going on, there are no computers, there's no Internet, right? They're barely like telephones. So withholding serves a lot of purposes. One of which, from the government point of view, is fewer people to deal with. If I can deal with Smith's Grocery that represents 20 people, that's much easier for me than dealing with all the 20 people who work in Smith's Grocery. And so the whole thing was pretty easy to do.

Speaker 2:
[22:59] All right, so this sounds pretty basic. Most people paid an income tax, but a lot of times it just came right out of their paycheck. So, how do we go from that to what we have now, where a tax return has all of these components in it?

Speaker 13:
[23:13] The total amount of income is not taxed, however, as each person is allowed certain deductions. You can deduct portions of medical and dental expenses.

Speaker 7:
[23:22] One reason it's complicated and isn't as complicated in some other countries is we've tried to use the tax system for many different things other than raising revenue.

Speaker 13:
[23:31] Charitable contributions, interest payments, certain taxes and so on.

Speaker 7:
[23:36] The federal government has decided it wants to encourage certain activities, wants to help people save for retirement. It wants to encourage them to give money to charities. Some of these programs could have been done by appropriations, but instead they're done through forgiving tax.

Speaker 2:
[23:54] What does he mean by that? Can you give me like an example?

Speaker 1:
[23:56] Let's start with World War II. In 1942, Congress gave President Roosevelt the power to freeze wages, and he introduced a maximum wage of $25,000.

Speaker 10:
[24:09] Taxation is the only practical way of preventing the incomes and profits of individuals and corporations from getting too high.

Speaker 1:
[24:17] Essentially, any income you made over $25,000 was taxed at nearly 100%.

Speaker 10:
[24:25] The nation must have more money to run the war. People must stop spending for luxuries. Our country needs a far greater share of our income.

Speaker 1:
[24:39] But, and here's where things get interesting, that wage cap applied to pay, salary, commissions, bonuses. But it did not apply to other kinds of compensation like insurance and pension benefits.

Speaker 7:
[24:56] When wages were capped, employers, in order to compensate their employees, started introducing health benefits, retirement benefits. The federal government wanted to encourage these things. So the amount of income you get in the form of employer contributions to health insurance is exempt from federal income tax.

Speaker 1:
[25:19] Especially because the employer also did not have to pay taxes on any income they spent on those kinds of programs.

Speaker 7:
[25:28] Which encourages employers to provide health insurance to their employees.

Speaker 2:
[25:34] Is this unique to the United States? I mean, employer-provided health care is one of those things that's now kind of the norm and the backbone of our health care system. And saving for retirement through work is for most people the only way they're able to retire. But I know that's not the case elsewhere. So what's different about our tax policy than other countries?

Speaker 7:
[25:56] Okay, so there are some very big differences. One is we don't have a national sales tax at the federal level. And we generally, even including states, we rely a lot less on consumption taxes than other countries. That means our tax system probably overall is a little bit more progressive than the tax systems in Europe.

Speaker 1:
[26:20] One way to think of this as more progressive is if there is a high sales tax on something, no matter how much money you earn, you pay that sales tax. Whereas, theoretically, the burden of the income tax is higher if you make more money.

Speaker 7:
[26:36] But, oddly enough, our fiscal system is less progressive. The reason I say this is they have these valuated taxes, but they have much more generous social benefits, health benefits and so forth. So, in a sense, we rely more on taxes for redistribution. They rely more on spending programs.

Speaker 1:
[26:57] So even though other countries may charge greater taxes on consumption, they also often spend more on programs that save people money or reduce their expenses. For example, the cost of health care.

Speaker 7:
[27:10] All the systems use some tax expenditures. I think, you know, our exemption of employer premiums is probably unique to our system because in other systems, they have more public funding of health care. So we don't need to have this encouragement of the employer system.

Speaker 1:
[27:31] So it's hard to compare income taxes across countries, but people in Denmark pay almost half of their income in taxes. And Denmark also has some of the highest consumption taxes, taxes that you pay when you buy something or go out to eat, which the United States has kept relatively low. High consumption taxes are also the norm in countries like Germany, Finland, Sweden, Norway.

Speaker 6:
[27:54] So how can it be that you have people who aren't making very much money, are paying a very high tax rate, and are paying taxes that in the United States, we say, are taxes that hurt the poor? Well, the reason is that they are actually providing tremendous benefits to their people outside of the tax system. Anybody who's a resident of Germany can go to college for free. In Scandinavia, you can get your health care for free. You're able to have a maternity leave. You I mean, all sorts of things that in the United States, it's all like it's on you, right? Your retirement is on you. Are you saving for it or are you not saving for it? You know, your maternity leave is between you and your employer. It's all fragmented and in those countries, they can do their taxes in less than two hours. Some of them don't do it at all, right? They just get like a letter from the government. This is what you owe. This is what you paid. Here's a check for the difference. Thank you very much. The reason why it's so complicated in the United States is because certain people are advantaged by the fact that it's complicated.

Speaker 2:
[29:25] So we've been talking about why our income taxes here in the US are so complicated. And so far, we have heard about how the government started using the tax code to shift behavior without passing laws, like incentivizing employers to provide health insurance and retirement plans. So what are some of the other carrots that the federal government has added to the tax code, Hannah?

Speaker 1:
[29:46] There are two main kinds of incentives, deductions and credits. We're going to talk about deductions first. Here's Eric Toder.

Speaker 7:
[29:55] Deductions reduce the amount of income on which you pay tax. So if I have 50,000 of income and then I get 10,000 of deductions, that reduces the amount of income I have to report to 40,000. So there are certain items that, for example, home mortgage interest or state and local income taxes or charitable contributions, which are the biggest, which you can claim as a deduction or subtract that from the income, which is subject to tax.

Speaker 2:
[30:27] So every year, you have to figure out which deductions you might qualify for and then find out how much of a deduction it would be and send all of that information to the IRS.

Speaker 1:
[30:39] If you go the itemized deduction route, yes. But there is another option.

Speaker 7:
[30:45] However, you can also claim a standard deduction. So depending on your marital status, you can deduct a certain amount in lieu of taking itemized deductions. So what you want to do is figure out whether your itemized deductions total up to more than the standard deduction. And if they do, you itemize. And if you don't, you take the standard deduction.

Speaker 1:
[31:07] Sometimes that itemized deduction is going to be more than a standard deduction, especially if you say own multiple properties or give to multiple charities, or if you have set up a charitable foundation in your name.

Speaker 7:
[31:22] Most people take the standard deduction. Most high income people use itemized deductions.

Speaker 1:
[31:29] Unlike deductions, which lower your taxable income, credits lower your tax bill. That's the amount you have to pay after deductions are factored in.

Speaker 7:
[31:38] If I were paying $500 of tax and I got a tax credit of $150, that would reduce my tax to $350. So it just comes right off of the tax.

Speaker 1:
[31:49] And many times that credit ends up showing up as a refund after you file your taxes. Basically, the government says, you overpaid this year, here's some money back.

Speaker 2:
[31:59] Is it possible to earn more in tax credits than you paid in taxes?

Speaker 1:
[32:03] OK, this is where tax credits get a little sticky. The answer is sometimes. Some credits are refundable, meaning that if the value of the tax credit is more than you owe in taxes, you have a negative tax bill.

Speaker 2:
[32:16] In other words, you get money instead of paying money.

Speaker 1:
[32:18] That's it. So if your tax bill was $500 and you had $600 in refundable tax credits, you would not owe any taxes and you would get $100. One of the main tax credits that is refundable is the earned income tax credit, which is specifically for people with lower incomes. But you have to have actually earned an income to qualify.

Speaker 2:
[32:40] But not all credits are refundable?

Speaker 1:
[32:42] Right. Many of them are not.

Speaker 2:
[32:43] I think I've got it. So how did these tax credits even end up in our tax policy? They seem complicated. Like with that earned income tax credit, why not just lower the tax rate for people who make under a certain amount?

Speaker 1:
[33:00] The answer is simple. Politics.

Speaker 7:
[33:03] So we all have different views of what public benefits the government should supply. We all have different views of how big the government should be. Your purchase of public goods through taxes is mandatory. So this is the one place where the government is taking something from you, as well as supplying you with something. So naturally, the question is, who should it take from? How should that burden be shared upon those? Those are basically political questions.

Speaker 1:
[33:34] And with that earned income tax credit and other tax credits designed to help people with lower incomes in particular, the politics have shifted a lot in the last couple of decades.

Speaker 2:
[33:45] How so?

Speaker 1:
[33:46] Well, remember how we talked about the New Deal ushering in all of these government programs to help support people while the country recovered from the Great Depression?

Speaker 2:
[33:55] Yeah.

Speaker 13:
[33:56] The remaining costs of government may be considered under general welfare. Social security programs provide retirement income for the elderly, financial support for widows, children, and others who've lost their means of support, as well as aid to the disabled and unemployed.

Speaker 1:
[34:12] In the last 30 years or so, a lot of these programs have transitioned from government expenditures to tax incentives instead. The 1980s were the era of Reaganomics. When the Reagan administration proposed streamlining the tax system by removing a lot of incentives while also cutting taxes across the board.

Speaker 9:
[34:34] When I sign this bill into law, America will have the lowest marginal tax rates and the most modern tax code among major industrialized nations.

Speaker 1:
[34:43] But especially for businesses and the wealthiest Americans.

Speaker 9:
[34:48] One that encourages risk-taking, innovation, and that old American spirit of enterprise.

Speaker 2:
[34:54] All right, so this is the so-called trickle-down economics.

Speaker 1:
[34:57] Yup, this was also called supply-side economics, and the theory was that if you cut taxes for businesses and for people with wealth to invest, they would invest that money back into the US economy rather than pocketing it. And after a lot of this reform and these massive tax cuts as we're coming out of the 80s, the political debate about how big the government should be and what it should pay for was centered on the value and logistics of welfare programs.

Speaker 9:
[35:26] More must be done to reduce poverty and dependency. And believe me, nothing is more important than welfare reform.

Speaker 14:
[35:31] One is the whole issue of welfare reform and more broadly, how we help people to lift themselves out of poverty and dependency.

Speaker 15:
[35:38] It's time to make welfare what it should be, a second chance, not a way of life.

Speaker 1:
[35:44] President Bill Clinton ran on a policy of welfare reform when he was elected in 1992.

Speaker 7:
[35:49] The incentives for retirement saving were greatly expanded. The earned income credit was introduced and then greatly expanded. The child credit was introduced. That was at the same time where aid for families would defend and children was repealed in welfare reform in 1996. So our system really moved more toward using the tax system for spending like programs.

Speaker 1:
[36:15] And Eric worked in the Clinton administration on some of the new policies that focused on taxes.

Speaker 7:
[36:21] When I was in the Clinton administration and we decided for political reasons we had to have a middle class tax cut, I think the main view was essentially government spending has a bad name and politicians wanted to keep what the public perceived to be the size of the government low and to provide more tax cuts, middle class tax cuts, other kinds of tax cuts. And so the way you could do this while still providing government social benefits was to provide credits and so forth through the tax system. So if we lowered rates a little bit, it just costs too much money. You couldn't, you couldn't lower rates across the board. So that said, we had to give some kind of credits or some benefit. So people had talked about a child credit and the number that Republicans had raised was $500. So we said, well, we have to have $500, it can't be less than $500.

Speaker 1:
[37:27] He's talking about the Balanced Budget Act of 1993. The way that worked is that families could get a $500 tax credit for every child they had under the age of 17. So when you filled out your taxes, if you had a kid under age 17, you'd have $500 taken off your tax bill.

Speaker 7:
[37:44] Well, how do we save money if it's $500? Well, we have to phase it out if people's income is above a certain amount. And maybe we want to limit it instead of with personal exemptions, which was 18, maybe we ought to limit it to people under 17. And you get the picture. You go through one contortion after another to hit these various targets for how you're changing the system. And those things just stay in there.

Speaker 2:
[38:18] I'm beginning to see how we ended up with such a complicated system, Hannah.

Speaker 1:
[38:23] And this changed the experience of people who used these programs. In part because for both deductions and tax credits, there's a responsibility on you, the taxpayer, to make sure you fill out the right paperwork and get those incentives.

Speaker 6:
[38:37] When the Clinton administration decided that it was going to kill welfare as we know it, that was one of the phrases, get rid of welfare as we know it.

Speaker 15:
[38:47] I have a plan to end welfare as we know it, to break the cycle of welfare dependency.

Speaker 6:
[38:52] So, you don't really have welfare offices anymore. People don't really use the word welfare. That all seems to have disappeared. But the money is still flowing to people. But now it's flowing to people through the tax system. If you hide it in the tax system, what you're doing is you're replacing social workers with H&R blood.

Speaker 1:
[39:18] Like Eric said before, many of the things treated as apportionment, that is the government sets up programs and funds them directly, were now offered as relief from your tax bill instead. And all of these things just keep being added to the tax code to make it work.

Speaker 7:
[39:35] The system is much more complicated than it needs to be and could use an overhaul. I mean, there are, you know, when you look at something like retirement plans, there are multiple different ways you can contribute. And for the average person to figure out how to navigate through these systems, even the programs for low-income people, like the education credits, many people just don't use them because they can't figure out how to navigate them. In order to fine-tune things, we've made things way more complicated than it needs to be.

Speaker 6:
[40:09] For a lot of people, it's terrifying. You know, they don't have the time, they don't have access to the things that they would need. Even if they have access to the things that they would need, the things that they would need are crazy complicated. The IRS produces all these instruction booklets, right? They could take, they're like war and peace. They use all sorts of language that makes sense to tax insiders, but doesn't necessarily make sense to anyone else. And so either you're going to like engage in that system and get the money that the government wants you to have, right? Or you're going to like not engage in that system and maybe end up in prison.

Speaker 2:
[41:10] Well, that's enough death and taxes today. This episode was written and produced by Christina Phillips with Mina Capodice and Hannah McCarthy. Our staff includes Jackie Fulton and Rebecca Lavoie is our executive producer. Music in this episode by the guy who wrote God Bless America, Irving Berlin, Jesse Gallagher, Raymond Grauze, Gritted, Blue Dot Sessions, Ketzer, Lee Rosevere, Lobo Loco, Nictum, Pictures of a Floating World, Prolator, Scott McCloud, Cooper Canal, Bala and the tax-free musical stylings of Chris Zabriskie. Civics 101 is produced by that station who I hope is kicking in their 6.2%? NHPR, New Hampshire Public Radio. I'm just kidding, of course they are.

Speaker 16:
[41:58] Have you ever wondered what businesses are doing and should be doing to tackle climate change? Then check out the award-winning and chart-topping podcast, Climate Rising, produced by Harvard Business School and hosted by me, Professor Mike Taufel. Recently named one of the best environmental podcasts by earth.org, Climate Rising shares a behind-the-scenes look at how some of the world's top entrepreneurs and business leaders are addressing climate change, from climate storytelling and marketing to AI, regenerative agriculture and beyond. Don't miss out, follow and listen to Climate Rising wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 17:
[42:28] Do you want the truth about the organic food on your plate? Then check out the chart topping Real Organic podcast. Recently named one of the best climate podcasts by earth.org. It's hosted by Dave Chapman and me, Lindley Dixon. Each week, we feature eye-opening interviews with farmers, scientists, authors and journalists to uncover the forces reshaping the food system from why corporate lobbying is redefining what organic means, to how organic farmers are fighting back. So don't miss it. Follow and listen to the Real Organic Podcast wherever you get your podcasts.